Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18840816›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2008

Prospective evaluation of risk factors for male breast cancer.

Louise A Brinton, Douglas A Richesson, Gretchen L Gierach, James V Lacey, Yikyung Park, Albert R Hollenbeck, Arthur Schatzkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors and risk of male breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  4. Diseases of the Male Breast: Gynecomastia and Breast Cancer.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  5. Survival Values of Iraqi Male Breast Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Orbital Metastases of Breast Cancer in Males.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Louise A BrintonHormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852-7234, USA. brinton@nih.gov
Douglas A Richesson
Gretchen L Gierach
James V Lacey
Yikyung Park
Albert R Hollenbeck
Arthur Schatzkin

Funding

Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Studies of Rare CancersZ01CP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI BRINTON, LOUISE · 2001 to 2008
$2.4M
Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer in the AARP CohortZ01CP010196 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SCHATZKIN, ARTHUR · 2008 to 2008
$1.5M
STRUCTURE AND STABILIZATION OF THE BACTERIAL NUCLEOIDZ01DK036120 · NIDDK · DIABETES, DIGESTIVE, KIDNEY DISEASES · PI ZIMMERMAN, STEVEN C. · 1998 to 2005
–
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most risk factors for male breast cancer have been derived from retrospective studies that may reflect selective recall. In the prospective National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study, we studied 324 920 men, among whom 121 developed breast cancer. Men who reported a first-degree relative with breast cancer had an increased risk of breast cancer (relative risk [RR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 3.09). Among the medical conditions examined, a new finding emerged regarding increased male breast cancer risk associated with a history of a bone fracture (RR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.24 to 3.91). Obesity was positively related to risk (RR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.10 to 2.91, for body mass indices of >or=30 vs <25 kg/m2) and physical activity inversely related, even after adjustment for body mass index. Smokers were at somewhat elevated risk, although trends with smoking characteristics were inconsistent. Alcohol consumption was not related to risk. The identified risk factors show some commonalities with female breast cancer and indicate the importance of hormonal mechanisms. Differences in risk factors may reflect unique mechanisms associated with androgens and their ratio to bioavailable estrogens.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAlcohol DrinkingBreast Neoplasms, MaleCohort StudiesFractures, BoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityObesityProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18840816
PMCPMC2720728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.