Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18840679›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008

Probing the origin of tubulin rigidity with molecular simulations.

Ruxandra I Dima, Harshad Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanism of fibrin(ogen) forced unfolding.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruxandra I DimaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA. ruxandra.dima@uc.edu
Harshad Joshi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tubulin heterodimers are the building blocks of microtubules, a major component of the cytoskeleton, whose mechanical properties are fundamental for the life of the cell. We uncover the microscopic origins of the mechanical response in microtubules by probing features of the energy landscape of the tubulin monomers and tubulin heterodimer. To elucidate the structures of the unfolding pathways and reveal the multiple unfolding routes, we performed simulations of a self-organized polymer (SOP) model of tubulin. The SOP representation, which is a coarse-grained description of chains, allows us to perform force-induced simulations at loading rates and time scales that closely match those used in single-molecule experiments. We show that the forced unfolding of each monomer involves a bifurcation in the pathways to the stretched state. After the unfolding of the C-term domain, the unraveling continues either from the N-term domain or from the middle domain, depending on the monomer and the pathway. In contrast to the unfolding complexity of the monomers, the dimer unfolds according to only one route corresponding to the unraveling of the C-term domain and part of the middle domain of beta-tubulin. We find that this surprising behavior is due to the viscoelastic properties of the interface between the monomers. We map precise features of the complex energy landscape of tubulin by surveying the structures of the various metastable intermediates, which, in the dimer case, are characterized only by changes in the beta-tubulin monomer.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDimerizationModels, MolecularProtein DenaturationProtein FoldingTubulinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID18840679
PMCPMC2572946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.