Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2008
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of venlafaxine: pupillary light reflex as a test system for noradrenergic effects.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of the effects of axomadol and its O-demethyl metabolite on pupil diameter and nociception in healthy subjects.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Trial
- Heart Rate Variability: A Measure of Cardiovascular Health and Possible Therapeutic Target in Dysautonomic Mental and Neurological Disorders.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2022Review
- Semimechanistic models to relate noxious stimulation, movement, and pupillary dilation responses in the presence of opioids.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2022Article
- Simultaneous Semi-Mechanistic Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Analysis of Enalapril and Enalaprilat Serum and Urine Concentrations From Child Appropriate Orodispersible Minitablets.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
- Adverse Effects of Antidepressants for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Autonomic Dysregulation in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Fundamentals of population pharmacokinetic modelling: validation methods.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2012Review
- Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: a report for the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force.British journal of cancer · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveVenlafaxine and its major active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine selectively inhibit serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake from the synaptic gap. The inhibition of norepinephrine uptake is assumed to enhance antidepressant efficacy when venlafaxine is given at higher therapeutic doses. Thus investigation of the concentration-response relationship of noradrenergic effects is of clinical interest. We used pupillography as a test system for the pharmacodynamic response to venlafaxine, since it had been shown to be useful for assessment of noradrenergic effects on the autonomous nervous system. The aim of the study was to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model by means of nonlinear mixed-effects modelling in order to describe the time course of the noradrenergic response to venlafaxine. SUBJECTS AND
methodsTwelve healthy male subjects received venlafaxine 37.5 mg or placebo orally twice daily for 7 days and subsequently 75 mg or placebo twice daily for another 7 days. After a 14-day washout phase, the two groups were crossed over. After the last dose of venlafaxine or placebo on day 14, blood samples were drawn to determine venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine concentrations and the amplitude and recovery time of the pupillary light reflex were measured. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed to describe the data using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling.
resultsThe pharmacokinetic part of the model could be simultaneously fitted to both venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine data, yielding precise parameter estimates that were similar to published data. The model detected high variability of the intrinsic clearance of venlafaxine (94.8%), most likely due to cytochrome P450 2D6 polymorphism. Rapid development of tolerance of the pupillary light reflex parameters was seen and could be successfully accounted for in the pharmacodynamic part of the model. The half-life of development and regression of tolerance was estimated to be 30 minutes for the amplitude and 40 minutes for the recovery time.
conclusionThe time course of the effect and the concentration-response relationship were successfully described by a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model that takes into account the rapid development of tolerance of pupillary light reflex parameters. This provides a basis for further investigations of the applicability of pupillography as a surrogate measurement of the effectivity of antidepressant drugs with norepinephrine reuptake-inhibiting properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.