Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18840015›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2008

Use of escitalopram during pregnancy: navigating towards international guidelines and the real world.

Salvatore Gentile

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Salvatore GentileMental Health Center n. 4-Department of Mental Health, ASL Salerno 1, Italy. salvatore_gentile@alice.it

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal psychiatric disorders commonly considered as moderate may have a devastating impact on the fetus and the newborn. Thus, treating or preventing relapse of these disorders during pregnancy is a clinical and ethical duty, despite the fact that the need for rapid maternal symptomatological improvement appears to be at odds with the necessity to avoid fetal drug exposure. Several guidelines and comprehensive reviews have been published to help clinicians faced with this difficult clinical decision. However, the uptake of these recommendations into clinical practice appears to have been less than complete, as suggested by the present case of a patient who was administered escitalopram throughout pregnancy. In this case, there was a healthy outcome for the child. However, this should not detract from the necessity to tackle the problem of inappropriate prescribing of psychotropic agents in pregnancy. Utilization of an integrated clinical approach, monitoring of drug levels throughout pregnancy and routine documentation of the health of the neonate are important measures that should be implemented and promoted to ensure optimal management of antenatal psychiatric disorders and minimize the effects of treatment on the newborn.

Indexed as

AdultCitalopramFemaleFetusHumansInfant, NewbornInternational CooperationLactationLive BirthMaleMaternal-Fetal ExchangePanic DisorderPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsCitalopramPsychotropic DrugsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.