ReviewClinical drug investigation2008
Using fixed-dose combination therapies to achieve blood pressure goals.
Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in participants with hypertension and diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or chronic cardiovascular disease: a subanalysis of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group TRINITY study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2012Trial
- Blood pressure effects of high-dose amlodipine-benazepril combination in Black and White hypertensive patients not controlled on monotherapy.Drugs in R&D · 2012Trial
- Long-term efficacy and safety of triple-combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate and hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2012Trial
- 24-hour efficacy and safety of Triple-Combination Therapy With Olmesartan, Amlodipine, and Hydrochlorothiazide: the TRINITY ambulatory blood pressure substudy.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2011Trial
- Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg combination therapy versus olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase III study.Clinical drug investigation · 2010Trial
- Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with the combination of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009Trial
- Three spectrophotometric quantitative analysis of bisoprolol fumarate and telmisartan in fixed-dose combination utilizing ratio spectra manipulation methods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Projecting the long-term benefits of single pill combination therapy for patients with hypertension in five countries.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2021Article
- Practical Applications for Single Pill Combinations in the Cardiovascular Continuum.Cardiac failure review · 2017Article
- Full-dose Perindopril/Indapamide in the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control Hypertension: The FORTISSIMO Study.Clinical drug investigation · 2017Observational
- Patient Adherence to Olmesartan/Amlodipine Combinations: Fixed Versus Extemporaneous Combinations.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016Article
- Comparisons of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine besylate/losartan and amlodipine camsylate/losartan in healthy subjects: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2016Article
- Early and sustained blood pressure control is necessary for stroke prevention.Journal of thoracic disease · 2015Article
- Comparative study of high dose mono-therapy of amlodipine or telmisartan, and their low dose combination in mild to moderate hypertension.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2014Article
- Blood pressure control and exaggerated blood pressure response in nigerians with essential hypertension.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2014Article
- Single-pill telmisartan and amlodipine: a rational combination for the treatment of hypertension.Drugs · 2011Review
- Hydrochlorothiazide versus calcium channel blockers: what is the best add-on to a renin-angiotensin system blocker for treating hypertension in patients with renal disease?Current hypertension reports · 2011Review
- Efficacy of fixed-dose combination therapy in the treatment of patients with hypertension: focus on amlodipine/valsartan.Clinical drug investigation · 2010Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension affects an estimated 88 million Americans and is controlled to the recommended blood pressure (BP) goal of <140/90 mmHg in only 37% of individuals with hypertension. The benefits of achieving these goals, including significant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, are well documented. Thus, a concerted effort to improve BP goal attainment is required. The majority of patients will require two or more antihypertensives to achieve BP goal. It has been shown that administering two drugs in a single-dose formulation substantially improves patient compliance compared with separate agent administration. Fixed-dose combination therapy can offer potential advantages over individual agents, including increased efficacy, reduced incidence of adverse effects, lower healthcare costs, and improved patient compliance through the use of a single medication administered once daily. Currently available fixed-dose agents include several combinations with complementary pharmacodynamic activity. This article reviews the fixed-dose antihypertensive combinations currently available in the US, and assesses the published literature comparing fixed-dose combinations with co-administration of two separate drugs or with other combinations. An analysis of the published literature between 1987 and 2007 reveals that most studies of fixed-dose antihypertensive combinations have compared the combination with monotherapy (53%); many fewer published papers have compared a fixed combination with coadministration of similar drugs as separate agents (2%), a fixed combination with another fixed combination from the same class (7%), or with a combination of agents from a different class (9%). Other comparisons have been with placebo, baseline or between generic formulations. This analysis indicates that: (i) physicians can be assured that a fixed-dose combination is more effective than either agent given as monotherapy; (ii) there is a paucity of data comparing different fixed-dose combinations; and (iii) very few studies have investigated the impact of fixed-dose combinations on achievement of BP goals, including both systolic BP and diastolic BP. For clinical decision making, physicians should rely on how the agents perform when administered together in add-on studies and how each component performs as monotherapy in reducing BP, achieving BP goals and reducing outcomes, as well as considering patient factors such as response to and tolerance of such agents as monotherapy and cost. The availability of effective and well tolerated fixed-dose combination antihypertensive agents should encourage primary-care physicians to be more willing to use such therapies in a timely manner when BP goals are not being achieved with monotherapy. This approach would improve BP control rates in the US and worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.