Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1883934›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1991

Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed.

P A DiMilla, K Barbee, D A Lauffenburger

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 231 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 616 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Nonlinear Stability in a Free Boundary Model of Active Locomotion.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Contractile forces direct the chiral swirling of minimal cell collectives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Time, the final frontier.Molecular oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Use of iPSC-Derived Smooth Muscle Cells to Model Physiology and Pathology.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mesenchymal cell migration on one-dimensional micropatterns.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P A DiMillaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104.
K Barbee
D A Lauffenburger
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

ANALYSIS OF MICROVESSEL ENDOTHELIAL CELL MIGRATIONR01GM041476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUFFENBURGER, DOUGLAS A · 1989 to 1991
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-41476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migration of mammalian blood and tissue cells over adhesive surfaces is apparently mediated by specific reversible reactions between cell membrane adhesion receptors and complementary ligands attached to the substratum. Although in a number of systems these receptors and ligand molecules have been isolated and identified, a theory capable of predicting the effects of their properties on cell migration behavior currently does not exist. We present a simple mathematical model for elucidating the dependence of cell speed on adhesion-receptor/ligand binding and cell mechanical properties. Our model can be applied to propose answers to questions such as: does an optimal adhesiveness exist for cell movement? How might changes in receptor and ligand density and/or affinity affect the rate of migration? Can cell rheological properties influence movement speed? This model incorporates cytoskeletal force generation, cell polarization, and dynamic adhesion as requirements for persistent cell movement. A critical feature is the proposed existence of an asymmetry in some cell adhesion-receptor property, correlated with cell polarity. We consider two major alternative mechanisms underlying this asymmetry: (a) a spatial distribution of adhesion-receptor number due to polarized endocytic trafficking and (b) a spatial variation in adhesion-receptor/ligand bond strength. Applying a viscoelastic-solid model for cell mechanics allows us to represent one-dimensional locomotion with a system of differential equations describing cell deformation and displacement along with adhesion-receptor dynamics. In this paper, we solve these equations under the simplifying assumption that receptor dynamics are at a quasi-steady state relative to cell locomotion. Thus, our results are strictly valid for sufficiently slow cell movement, as typically observed for tissue cells such as fibroblasts. Numerical examples relevant to experimental systems are provided. Our results predict how cell speed might vary with intracellular contractile force, cell rheology, receptor/ligand kinetics, and receptor/ligand number densities. A biphasic dependence is shown to be possible with respect to some of the system parameters, with position of the maxima essentially governed by a balance between transmitted contractile force and adhesiveness. We demonstrate that predictions for the two alternative asymmetry mechanisms can be distinguished and could be experimentally tested using cell populations possessing different adhesion-receptor numbers.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell MovementModels, BiologicalAnimalsCell Physiological PhenomenaCellsEndocytosisMammalsMathematics

Identifiers

PMID1883934
PMCPMC1260035
OpenAlexW1983838379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.