Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18839253›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2008

Effects of fertilization and fungal and insect attack on systemic protein defenses of austrian pine.

Kathryn Barto, Stephanie Enright, Alieta Eyles, Chris Wallis, Rodrigo Chorbadjian, Robert Hansen, Daniel A Herms, Pierluigi Bonello, Don Cipollini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathryn BartoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435, USA.
Stephanie Enright
Alieta Eyles
Chris Wallis
Rodrigo Chorbadjian
Robert Hansen
Daniel A Herms
Pierluigi Bonello
Don Cipollini
The Ohio State University · USWright State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their economic and ecological importance, defense responses of conifers to pests are little understood. In a 3-year experiment, we monitored systemic fungal (Diplodia pinea)- and insect (Neodiprion sertifer)-induced defense protein activities and total soluble proteins in needles and phloem of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) across a soil fertility gradient. In both years, total soluble protein content of foliage and phloem declined with increasing fertility across induction treatments, while defensive protein activities generally increased with increasing fertility. In 2005, total soluble protein content in branch phloem was increased by fungal inoculation of the stem. Peroxidase activity was suppressed in needles by insect defoliation in 2006, while polyphenol oxidase activity was systemically induced in branch phloem by insect attack in 2005. Trypsin inhibitor activities in phloem did not respond to any induction or fertility treatment. Nutritive quality of Austrian pine tissue declined with increasing fertility, while several protein-based defenses simultaneously increased.

Indexed as

SoilAnimalsAscomycotaCatechol OxidaseChitinasesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHymenopteraNutritive ValuePeroxidasePhloemPinusPlant ProteinsTrypsin InhibitorsCatechol OxidaseChitinasesPeroxidasePlant ProteinsSoilTrypsin Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID18839253
OpenAlexW2007671699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.