Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18839135›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2008

[Complications after cruciate ligament reconstruction].

H O Mayr, C Zeiler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Sports-specific differences in postsurgical infections after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H O MayrOCM - Klinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie München, München. hermann.mayr@ocm-muenchen.de
C Zeiler
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEMünchen Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments is elective surgery performed mainly on younger people. Therefore, complications are especially tragic. Diagnostics and indications include the possibility of complications. The complexity of an injury must be thoroughly appreciated, and to avoid intraoperative complications, it is important for the surgeon to have a comprehensive anatomical knowledge. A great number of stabilization procedures exist, each with its own learning curve and specific risks. Therefore, lab training of surgeons appears reasonable. The frequency of thromboembolism in the early postoperative stage should be minimized by evidence-based prophylaxis. Early diagnostics and treatment of thrombosis, embolism, and infection are required, and consultants should be brought in if necessary. Postoperative movement malfunction as arthrofibrosis can be widely avoided by the correct choice of the point for surgery and the surgical procedure. If arthrofibrosis occurs, mobility must be restored at an early stage, with special focus on full extension. A failure of reconstructed cruciate ligaments during rehabilitation and reintegration into sports is mostly based on overload of the ligaments. The stability of the reconstructed ligaments at the respective time point and motor function as well as the patient's physical condition should be reasonably considered. A medium-term graft failure is often based on surgical errors. So-called biological failure occurs only rarely.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesArthritis, InfectiousArthroscopyHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsKnee InjuriesPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis FailureProsthesis ImplantationTendons

Identifiers

PMID18839135
OpenAlexW1827785272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.