ReviewDer Orthopade2008
[Complications after cruciate ligament reconstruction].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Arthroscopic treatment of arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction. Local and generalized arthrofibrosis].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2014Trial
- Septic arthritis or adult-onset still's disease: analyzing the causes of recurrent fever after arthroscopic combined anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Sports-specific differences in postsurgical infections after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017Article
- [Complications of knee arthroscopy].Der Orthopade · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments is elective surgery performed mainly on younger people. Therefore, complications are especially tragic. Diagnostics and indications include the possibility of complications. The complexity of an injury must be thoroughly appreciated, and to avoid intraoperative complications, it is important for the surgeon to have a comprehensive anatomical knowledge. A great number of stabilization procedures exist, each with its own learning curve and specific risks. Therefore, lab training of surgeons appears reasonable. The frequency of thromboembolism in the early postoperative stage should be minimized by evidence-based prophylaxis. Early diagnostics and treatment of thrombosis, embolism, and infection are required, and consultants should be brought in if necessary. Postoperative movement malfunction as arthrofibrosis can be widely avoided by the correct choice of the point for surgery and the surgical procedure. If arthrofibrosis occurs, mobility must be restored at an early stage, with special focus on full extension. A failure of reconstructed cruciate ligaments during rehabilitation and reintegration into sports is mostly based on overload of the ligaments. The stability of the reconstructed ligaments at the respective time point and motor function as well as the patient's physical condition should be reasonably considered. A medium-term graft failure is often based on surgical errors. So-called biological failure occurs only rarely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.