Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18839124›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2008

[Sex differences in cardiovascular drug targeting].

V Regitz-Zagrosek, C Schubert, S Krüger

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V Regitz-ZagrosekBerliner Institut für Geschlechterforschung in der Medizin (GiM) und CCR, Charité, Hessische Strasse 3-4, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland. vera.regitz-zagrosek@charite.de
C Schubert
S Krüger
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women and men differ in drug needs and drug metabolism. Usually women are smaller and lighter and have a higher body fat percentage and lower kidney function. Primary drug-metabolizing enzymes in the intestinal wall and liver, which are part of the cytochrome P450 family, have different activities in men and women. Their substrates (beta-blockers, blockers of calcium channels such as nifedipine and verapamil, cyclosporine, and many others) are metabolized differently. Sex differences were observed after administration of digitalis, which is often overdosed in women. Furthermore, beta-blockers are found at higher plasma levels in women and ACE inhibitors cause more side effects in women than in men. In women, acetylsalicylic acid provides effective primary prophylaxis against stroke but not myocardial infarction. In men, these drugs have opposite effects. Anticoagulants and thrombolytics often lead to bleeding complications in women, QT prolonging drugs produce more frequently arrhythmia. It is therefore very important to control drugs following approval and to look out for these differences between men and women.

Indexed as

AdultCardiotonic AgentsCoronary DiseaseDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex DistributionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCardiotonic Agents

Identifiers

PMID18839124
OpenAlexW1829065595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.