Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18838954›Full record

ReviewReviews in neurological diseases2008

The treatment of giant cell arteritis.

J Alexander Fraser, Cornelia M Weyand, Nancy J Newman, Valérie Biousse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in neurological diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Evidence-based Role of Aspirin in Giant Cell Arteritis: A Literature Review.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuro-Ophthalmic Emergencies.Neurologic clinics · 2021
    Review
  8. Corticosteroid Usage in Giant Cell Arteritis.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Considerations for the Treatment of Inflammatory Neuro-Ophthalmologic Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Alexander FraserDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario School of Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada.
Cornelia M Weyand
Nancy J Newman
Valérie Biousse
Western University · CA

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NICKERSON, JOHN M · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
OCULAR DISEASE IN GIANT CELL ARTERITISR01EY011916 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEYAND, CORNELIA M. · 1997 to 2011
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NEI NIH HHS P30-EY06360NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011916NEI NIH HHS R01 EY11916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a well-known vasculitis sensitive to corticosteroid-mediated immunosuppression, numerous issues of long-term therapeutic management remain unresolved. Because GCA encompasses a broad spectrum of clinical subtypes, ranging from devastating visual loss and neurological deficits to isolated systemic symptoms, the treatment of GCA must be adjusted to each case, and recommendations vary widely in the literature. This article systematically reviews the treatment options for patients with neuro-ophthalmic and neurological complications of GCA, as well as the evidence for possible adjuvant therapies for patients with GCA. Although there is no randomized controlled clinical trial specifically evaluating GCA patients with ocular and neurological complications, we recommend that GCA patients with acute visual loss or brain ischemia be admitted to the hospital for high-dose intravenous methyl-prednisolone, close monitoring, and prevention of steroid-induced complications. Aspirin may also be helpful in these cases. The evidence supporting the use of steroid-sparing immunomodulatory agents such as methotrexate for long-term management remains debated.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBrain IschemiaDrug Administration ScheduleFibrinolytic AgentsGiant Cell ArteritisHospitalizationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexateMethylprednisoloneOptic Neuropathy, IschemicAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsFibrinolytic AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexateMethylprednisolone

Identifiers

PMID18838954
PMCPMC3014829
OpenAlexW1788988135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.