Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18838060›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2008

Emerging issues in the neuropsychology of HIV infection.

Jessica Foley, Mark Ettenhofer, Matthew Wright, Charles H Hinkin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of a self-report measure of cognitive change: assessment of interpretability in two samples, people with HIV and people without HIV.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica FoleyDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 760 Westwood Plaza, Room C8-747, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Mark Ettenhofer
Matthew Wright
Charles H Hinkin

Funding

NEUROSPYCHOLOGY AIDS FELLOWSHIPT32MH019535 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HINKIN, CHARLES H · 1991 to 2017
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurocognitive compromise, a common sequela of HIV infection, ranges in severity from minor motor and information-processing speed decrements to severely incapacitating symptoms that affect functional independence. However, with the emergence of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), neurocognitive phenotypes have become highly heterogeneous and increasingly fail to resemble pre-HAART presentations. This article provides an overview of our current knowledge of HIV-associated neuropsychological abnormalities, with an emphasis on the most recent attempts to classify cognitive impairment within Western and developing societies, the emergence of diverse cognitive presentations in the post-HAART era, factors that moderate the development or impact of HIV-related neurocognitive and functional deficits, and the neurophysiologic consequences of infection.

Indexed as

AIDS Dementia ComplexCognition DisordersNeuropsychological TestsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveHIV InfectionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID18838060
PMCPMC3616484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.