Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18837788›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2008

Protective CD8 T cells against Plasmodium liver stages: immunobiology of an 'unnatural' immune response.

Michael Glen Overstreet, Ian Andrew Cockburn, Yun-Chi Chen, Fidel Zavala

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. CD8MedComm · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Overview of the host immune response toJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2025
    Review
  16. Malaria: past, present, and future.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  17. A landscape review of malaria vaccine candidates in the pipeline.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024
    Review
  18. Overview ofComparative medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Glen OverstreetMolecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Ian Andrew Cockburn
Yun-Chi Chen
Fidel Zavala
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

EFFECTOR AND MEMORY ANTIMALARIA CD8+ CELL RESPONSESR01AI044375 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZAVALA, FIDEL P · 1999 to 2013
$6.5M
EFFECTOR AND MEMORY ANTIMALARIA CD8+ T CELL RESPONSESR21AI044375 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ZAVALA, FIDEL P · 1999 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI44375NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044375NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI044375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryImmunization with high doses of irradiated sporozoites delivered by the bites of infected mosquitoes has been shown to induce protective responses against malaria, mediated in part by CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, natural transmission involving low exposure to live sporozoite antigen fails to elicit strong immunity. In this review, we examine how irradiated sporozoite immunization breaks the natural host-parasite interaction and induces protective CD8(+) T cells. Upon biting, the malaria-infected mosquitoes deposit parasites in the skin, many of which eventually exit to the bloodstream and infect hepatocytes. However, certain antigens, including the circumsporozoite (CS) protein, remain in the skin and are presented in the draining lymph node. These antigens prime specific CD8(+) T cells, which migrate to the liver where they eliminate parasitized hepatocytes. We discuss the relevance of the different tissue compartments involved in the induction and effector phases of this response, as well as the cellular requirements for priming and memory development of CD8(+) T cells, which include a complete dependence on dendritic cells and a near absolute need for CD4(+) T-cell help. Finally, we discuss the impact of the immunodominant CS protein on this protection and the implications of these findings for vaccine design.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansLiverMalariaMalaria VaccinesPlasmodium bergheiProtozoan ProteinsSporozoitesAntigens, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanMalaria VaccinesProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18837788
PMCPMC2597001
OpenAlexW2137022726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.