Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18837088›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2008

Effects of anatomical position on esophageal transit time: a biomagnetic diagnostic technique.

Teodoro Cordova-Fraga, Modesto Sosa, Carlos Wiechers, Jose-Maria De la Roca-Chiapas, Alejandro Maldonado Moreles, Jesus Bernal-Alvarado, Raquel Huerta-Franco

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The microbiome and critical illness.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Scintigraphy vs. mechanical magnetogastrography: gastric emptying analysis.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teodoro Cordova-FragaInstituto de Fisica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Lomas del Campestre, Leon 37150, Gto., Mexico.
Modesto Sosa
Carlos Wiechers
Jose-Maria De la Roca-Chiapas
Alejandro Maldonado Moreles
Jesus Bernal-Alvarado
Raquel Huerta-Franco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the esophageal transit time (ETT) and compare its mean value among three anatomical inclinations of the body; and to analyze the correlation of ETT to body mass index (BMI).

methodsA biomagnetic technique was implemented to perform this study: (1) The transit time of a magnetic marker (MM) through the esophagus was measured using two fluxgate sensors placed over the chest of 14 healthy subjects; (2) the ETT was assessed in three anatomical positions (at upright, fowler, and supine positions; 90 degrees , 45 degrees and 0 degrees , respectively).

resultsANOVA and Tuckey post-hoc tests demonstrated significant differences between ETT mean of the different positions. The ETT means were 5.2 +/- 1.1 s, 6.1 +/- 1.5 s, and 23.6 +/- 9.2 s for 90 degrees , 45 degrees and 0 degrees , respectively. Pearson correlation results were r = -0.716 and P < 0.001 by subjects' anatomical position, and r = -0.024 and P > 0.05 according the subject's BMI.

conclusionWe demonstrated that using this biomagnetic technique, it is possible to measure the ETT and the effects of the anatomical position on the ETT.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemGastrointestinal TransitMagneticsPostureBody Mass IndexEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSupine PositionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID18837088
PMCPMC2748206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.