ArticleGenome biology2008
Introducing meta-services for biomedical information extraction.
Article in Genome biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Literature-based discovery of IFN-gamma and vaccine-mediated gene interaction networks.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2010Pooled it
- The missing link in FAIR data policy: biodata resources in life sciences.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Pre-trained models, data augmentation, and ensemble learning for biomedical information extraction and document classification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Making Biomedical Sciences publications more accessible for machines.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022Article
- Next generation community assessment of biomedical entity recognition web servers: metrics, performance, interoperability aspects of BeCalm.Journal of cheminformatics · 2019Article
- iTextMine: integrated text-mining system for large-scale knowledge extraction from the literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- The CHEMDNER corpus of chemicals and drugs and its annotation principles.Journal of cheminformatics · 2015Article
- tmBioC: improving interoperability of text-mining tools with BioC.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- BioC: a minimalist approach to interoperability for biomedical text processing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
- U-Compare bio-event meta-service: compatible BioNLP event extraction services.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Assessment of NER solutions against the first and second CALBC Silver Standard Corpus.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2011Article
- The Protein-Protein Interaction tasks of BioCreative III: classification/ranking of articles and linking bio-ontology concepts to full text.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Soft tagging of overlapping high confidence gene mention variants for cross-species full-text gene normalization.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Overview of the BioCreative III Workshop.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- The 2nd DBCLS BioHackathon: interoperable bioinformatics Web services for integrated applications.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2011Article
- Human protein reference database and human proteinpedia as discovery resources for molecular biotechnology.Molecular biotechnology · 2011Article
- Article
- The DBCLS BioHackathon: standardization and interoperability for bioinformatics web services and workflows. The DBCLS BioHackathon Consortium*.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2010Article
- For I dipped into the future.EMBO reports · 2010Article
- Moara: a Java library for extracting and normalizing gene and protein mentions.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We introduce the first meta-service for information extraction in molecular biology, the BioCreative MetaServer (BCMS; http://bcms.bioinfo.cnio.es/). This prototype platform is a joint effort of 13 research groups and provides automatically generated annotations for PubMed/Medline abstracts. Annotation types cover gene names, gene IDs, species, and protein-protein interactions. The annotations are distributed by the meta-server in both human and machine readable formats (HTML/XML). This service is intended to be used by biomedical researchers and database annotators, and in biomedical language processing. The platform allows direct comparison, unified access, and result aggregation of the annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.