Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18833290›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2008

Quantitative analysis of snoRNA association with pre-ribosomes and release of snR30 by Rok1 helicase.

Markus T Bohnsack, Martin Kos, David Tollervey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TheRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional diversity of small nucleolar RNAs.Nucleic acids research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Markus T BohnsackWellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK.
Martin Kos
David Tollervey
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In yeast, three small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are essential for the processing of pre-ribosomal RNA--U3, U14 and snR30--whereas 72 non-essential snoRNAs direct site-specific modification of pre-rRNA. We applied a quantitative screen for alterations in the pre-ribosome association to all 75 yeast snoRNAs in strains depleted of eight putative helicases implicated in 40S subunit synthesis. For the modification-guide snoRNAs, we found no clear evidence for the involvement of these helicases in the association or dissociation of pre-ribosomes. However, the DEAD box helicase Rok1 was required specifically for the release of snR30. Point mutations in motif I, but not in motif III, of the helicase domain of Rok1 impaired the release of snR30, but this was less marked than in strains depleted of Rok1, and resulted in a dominant-negative growth phenotype. Dissociation of U3 and U14 from pre-ribosomes is also dependent on helicases, suggesting that release of the essential snoRNAs might differ mechanistically from release of the modification-guide snoRNAs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesGenetic Complementation TestMolecular WeightMutationRibosomesRNA, FungalRNA, Small NucleolarSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesRNA, FungalRNA, Small NucleolarROK1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18833290
PMCPMC2570499
OpenAlexW2135119901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.