Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18832456›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2008

Delineation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma by silver in situ hybridization is reproducible among laboratories and pathologists.

Antonino Carbone, Gerardo Botti, Annunziata Gloghini, Gianni Simone, Mauro Truini, Maria Pia Curcio, Patrizia Gasparini, Anita Mangia, Tiziana Perin, Sandra Salvi and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Laminin 332 expression in breast carcinoma.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM · 2012
    Trial
  3. Image analysis for bright-field HER2 in situ hybridization: validation for clinical use.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Testing for HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Continuing Evolution.Pathology research international · 2010
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Antonino CarboneDepartment of Pathology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy. antonino.carbone@istitutotumori.mi.it
Gerardo Botti
Annunziata Gloghini
Gianni Simone
Mauro Truini
Maria Pia Curcio
Patrizia Gasparini
Anita Mangia
Tiziana Perin
Sandra Salvi
Adele Testi
Paolo Verderio
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An automated enzyme metallographic silver in situ hybridization method (SISH) has been reported to successfully determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification. We evaluated the staining and interpretative reproducibility of the HER2 SISH assay at five laboratories and compared SISH results with other in situ hybridization (ISH) methods. The HER2 gene status of 89 breast carcinomas was analyzed in parallel using manual dual-color fluorescence ISH, manual chromogenic ISH, and bright-field automated SISH. A total of 1098 SISH-stained slides were evaluated. For comparison, all specimens were stained by 4B5 immunohistochemistry for HER2 protein expression. Interpretation was performed by pathologists at five different laboratories using the algorithms provided by the manufacturers and the guidelines of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists. Staining and interpretative reproducibility were measured through the computation of weighted kappa statistics. Following the optimization of SISH staining, 1077/1098 (98%) of slides were evaluable. Excellent reproducibility and efficacy of HER2 SISH staining, and interobserver interpretation (Kw = 0.91), were observed among five sites. For the 89 invasive breast cancer cases, the overall rate of concordance between consensus 4B5 and consensus SISH, fluorescence ISH, and chromogenic ISH was 96.6% (86/89), 97.8% (87/89), and 96.6% (86/89), respectively. Overall concordance between positive and negative SISH and fluorescence ISH results, as well as between individual and consensus positive and negative SISH results, was excellent (P < 0.001).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansIn Situ HybridizationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID18832456
PMCPMC2570636
OpenAlexW1985431905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.