ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2008
A procedure for highly specific, sensitive, and unbiased whole-genome amplification.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Relatively Low-Cost Method to Derive HIV-1 Integration Sites and Proviral Sequences.Viruses · 2026Article
- Article
- Improving STR typing for low template DNA by abasic-site-mediated semi-linear preamplification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of multiple displacement amplification for metagenomic analysis of low biomass samples.ISME communications · 2024Article
- A primer-independent DNA polymerase-based method for competent whole-genome amplification of intermediate to high GC sequences.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- The Evolution of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Technology and Application: Progress and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Reproducibility of the Infinium methylationEPIC BeadChip assay using low DNA amounts.Epigenetics · 2022Article
- A simple and general approach to generate photoactivatable DNA processing enzymes.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Revealing COBiodesign research · 2022Article
- Review
- Insertional activation ofScience advances · 2021Article
- Article
- HIV-1 viremia not suppressible by antiretroviral therapy can originate from large T cell clones producing infectious virus.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Article
- Generation of Inexpensive, Highly Labeled Probes for FluorescenceSTAR protocols · 2020Article
- Single-pollen-cell sequencing for gamete-based phased diploid genome assembly in plants.Genome research · 2019Article
- Using barcoded Zika virus to assess virus population structure in vitro and in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.Virology · 2018Article
- Capturing the 'ome': the expanding molecular toolbox for RNA and DNA library construction.Nucleic acids research · 2018Review
- Successful use of whole genome amplified DNA from multiple source types for high-density Illumina SNP microarrays.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Molecularly barcoded Zika virus libraries to probe in vivo evolutionary dynamics.PLoS pathogens · 2018Article
- Comparison of methods for library construction and short read annotation of shellfish viral metagenomes.Genes & genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Highly specific amplification of complex DNA pools without bias or template-independent products (TIPs) remains a challenge. We have developed a method using phi29 DNA polymerase and trehalose and optimized control of amplification to create micrograms of specific amplicons without TIPs from down to subfemtograms of DNA. With an input of as little as 0.5-2.5 ng of human gDNA or a few cells, the product could be close to native DNA in locus representation. The amplicons from 5 and 0.5 ng of DNA faithfully demonstrated all previously known heterozygous segmental duplications and deletions (3 Mb to 18 kb) located on chromosome 22 and even a homozygous deletion smaller than 1 kb with high-resolution chromosome-wide comparative genomic hybridization. With 550k Infinium BeadChip SNP typing, the >99.7% accuracy was compared favorably with results on unamplified DNA. Importantly, underrepresentation of chromosome termini that occurred with GenomiPhi v2 was greatly rescued with the present procedure, and the call rate and accuracy of SNP typing were also improved for the amplicons with a 0.5-ng, partially degraded DNA input. In addition, the amplification proceeded logarithmically in terms of total yield before saturation; the intact cells was amplified >50 times more efficiently than an equivalent amount of extracted DNA; and the locus imbalance for amplicons with 0.1 ng or lower input of DNA was variable, whereas for higher input it was largely reproducible. This procedure facilitates genomic analysis with single cells or other traces of DNA, and generates products suitable for analysis by massively parallel sequencing as well as microarray hybridization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.