Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18832061›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2009

Experimental evolution of a microbial predator's ability to find prey.

Kristina L Hillesland, Gregory J Velicer, Richard E Lenski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Milestones in the development ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Parallel Evolution in PredatoryApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. In the light of evolution V: cooperation and conflict.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  15. Using artificial systems to explore the ecology and evolution of symbioses.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  16. Comparative analysis of myxococcus predation on soil bacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2010
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Rapid evolution of stability and productivity at the origin of a microbial mutualism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristina L HilleslandDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. hilleskl@u.washington.edu
Gregory J Velicer
Richard E Lenski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraging theory seeks to explain how the distribution and abundance of prey influence the evolution of predatory behaviour, including the allocation of effort to searching for prey and handling them after they are found. While experiments have shown that many predators alter their behaviour phenotypically within individual lifetimes, few have examined the actual evolution of predatory behaviour in light of this theory. Here, we test the effects of prey density on the evolution of a predator's searching and handling behaviours using a bacterial predator, Myxococcus xanthus. Sixteen predator populations evolved for almost a year on agar surfaces containing patches of Escherichia coli prey at low or high density. Improvements in searching rate were significantly greater in those predators that evolved at low prey density. Handling performance also improved in some predator populations, but prey density did not significantly affect the magnitude of these gains. As the predators evolved greater foraging proficiency, their capacity diminished to produce fruiting bodies that enable them to survive prolonged periods of starvation. More generally, these results demonstrate that predators evolve behaviours that reflect at least some of the opportunities and limitations imposed by the distribution and abundance of their prey.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEscherichia coliMyxococcus xanthus

Identifiers

PMID18832061
PMCPMC2664338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.