Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18831781›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2008

Use artificial neural network to align biological ontologies.

Jingshan Huang, Jiangbo Dang, Michael N Huhns, W Jim Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Challenges in Using a Graph Database to Represent and Analyze Mappings of Cancer Study Data Standards.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingshan HuangDept Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. huang@musc.edu
Jiangbo Dang
Michael N Huhns
W Jim Zheng

Funding

THE ROLE OF THE RNA BINDING PROTEIN LA IN ORAL TUMOR BIOLOGYP20RR017696 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SOMMER, GUNHILD · 2002 to 2011
$20.7M
ZINC AND COPPER METABOLISM IN COLLAGEN DISORDERSM01RR001070 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI REVES, JOSEPH G · 1985 to 2009
$16.3M
NCRR NIH HHS 5 P20 RR017696-05NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001070NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR01070NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeing formal, declarative knowledge representation models, ontologies help to address the problem of imprecise terminologies in biological and biomedical research. However, ontologies constructed under the auspices of the Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) group have exhibited a great deal of variety, because different parties can design ontologies according to their own conceptual views of the world. It is therefore becoming critical to align ontologies from different parties. During automated/semi-automated alignment across biological ontologies, different semantic aspects, i.e., concept name, concept properties, and concept relationships, contribute in different degrees to alignment results. Therefore, a vector of weights must be assigned to these semantic aspects. It is not trivial to determine what those weights should be, and current methodologies depend a lot on human heuristics.

resultsIn this paper, we take an artificial neural network approach to learn and adjust these weights, and thereby support a new ontology alignment algorithm, customized for biological ontologies, with the purpose of avoiding some disadvantages in both rule-based and learning-based aligning algorithms. This approach has been evaluated by aligning two real-world biological ontologies, whose features include huge file size, very few instances, concept names in numerical strings, and others.

conclusionThe promising experiment results verify our proposed hypothesis, i.e., three weights for semantic aspects learned from a subset of concepts are representative of all concepts in the same ontology. Therefore, our method represents a large leap forward towards automating biological ontology alignment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerComputational BiologyInformation Storage and RetrievalSemanticsVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID18831781
PMCPMC2559880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.