ReviewBest practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology2008
Ventilator-associated pneumonia: problems with diagnosis and therapy.
Review in Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- How healthcare must respond to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in invasively mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2021Article
- The endotracheal tube microbiome associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus epidermidis.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Dental and ENT Evaluation Before Liver Transplantation.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia, VAP, is problematic because of a lack of objective tools that are utilized to make an assessment of bacterial-induced lung injury in a heterogeneous group of hosts. Clinical symptoms and signs are used to identify patients that may have a "lung infection". However, the symptoms and signs can be produced by a myriad of other conditions. Recent clinical data also suggests bacterial-induced pathologic processes occur prior to the onset of the symptoms and signs. Utilizing bacterial culture alone, health care practitioners are forced to wait for days for results and will have to order days of empiric antibiotic therapy. Exploratory molecular studies utilizing clone libraries and molecular arrays for microbial identification document the inability of culture-based techniques to even identify all the microbes involved in VAP. These molecular studies also offer evidence that oral flora present in the lungs of patients with VAP, suggesting aspiration of oral secretions and/or biofilms on endotracheal tubes, supply the bacteria for VAP. Much more investigation is needed to determine the optimal timing of antibiotic treatment and which diagnostic molecular methods can be utilized in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.