Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18830812›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2008

Causal beliefs, cardiac denial and pre-hospital delays following the onset of acute coronary syndromes.

Linda Perkins-Porras, Daisy L Whitehead, Philip C Strike, Andrew Steptoe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Denial of cardiac illness: consequences and management.The primary care companion for CNS disorders · 2011
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda Perkins-PorrasDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cranmer Terrace, St. George's University of London, London, SW17 0RE, UK. lperkins@sgul.ac.uk
Daisy L Whitehead
Philip C Strike
Andrew Steptoe

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing pre-hospital delay is crucial in reducing mortality from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Patient's causal beliefs and coping styles may affect symptom appraisal and help-seeking behavior. We examined whether patient's beliefs about the causes of their ACS and denial of impact were associated with pre-hospital delay. Pre-hospital delay data were collected from 177 patients with ACS. Retrospective causal beliefs and cardiac denial of impact were assessed using questionnaires. Factor analysis of causal beliefs produced 3 factors; beliefs in stress and emotional state, behavioral and clinical risk factors, and in heredity as causal influences. Patients with strong beliefs that stress and emotional state caused their ACS were more likely to have long pre-hospital delays (>130 min). There were no significant associations between pre-hospital delay and the other two causal belief factors. Patients with greater denial scores were also more likely to have long delays than those with low scores. These effects were independent of age, gender, education, previous myocardial infarction, history of depression and negative affectivity. Cognitive and emotional factors including patient's beliefs about causes and avoidant coping help to explain variations in pre-hospital delay.

Indexed as

Denial, PsychologicalEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAcute Coronary SyndromeAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsTransportation of Patients

Identifiers

PMID18830812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.