Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18830764›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2008

Numeracy and communication with patients: they are counting on us.

Andrea J Apter, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Janine T Remillard, Ian M Bennett, Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph, Rosanna M Batista, James Hyde, Rima E Rudd

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00115323 nacompletednot on this map

Individualized Interventions to Improve Asthma Adherence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2005 to 2010Enrolled397ConditionsAsthma, Lung DiseasesArmsProblem Solving, Attention Control
NCT02671643 completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

To Determine the Measurement Properties of the ACT in an African American Adolescent Population With Persistent Asthma Followed at a Subspecialty Clinic

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2014 to 2017Enrolled54ConditionsAsthma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Clearing clinical barriers: enhancing social support using a patient navigator for asthma care.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2010
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A process for creating data report-back tools to improve equity in environmental health.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Call for More Rigor in Science and Health Communication.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea J ApterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. apter@mail.med.upenn.edu
Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Janine T Remillard
Ian M Bennett
Elana Pearl Ben-Joseph
Rosanna M Batista
James Hyde
Rima E Rudd

Funding

Individualized Interventions to Improve Asthma AdherenceR01HL073932 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI APTER, ANDREA J. · 2005 to 2009
$3.6M
Literacy & Maternal Health; Defining Obstacles to CareK23HD048915 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BENNETT, IAN MOORE · 2007 to 2011
$664k
Literacy and improving patient-clinician encounters for AsthmaK02HL088469 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI APTER, ANDREA J. · 2007 to 2011
$526k
NHLBI NIH HHS K02 HL088469NHLBI NIH HHS K02HL088469NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073932NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL073932NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD048915NICHD NIH HHS K23HD048915NICHD NIH HHS R03HD0540432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-centered interactive communication between physicians and patients is recommended to improve the quality of medical care. Numerical concepts are important components of such exchanges and include arithmetic and use of percentages, as well as higher level tasks like estimation, probability, problem-solving, and risk assessment--the basis of preventive medicine. Difficulty with numerical concepts may impede communication. The current evidence on prevalence, measurement, and outcomes related to numeracy is presented, along with a summary of best practices for communication of numerical information. This information is integrated into a hierarchical model of mathematical concepts and skills, which can guide clinicians toward numerical communication that is easier to use with patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationMathematicsPhysician-Patient RelationsEducational StatusHumansPatient-Centered CarePatient Education as Topic

Identifiers

PMID18830764
PMCPMC2596505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.