Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18830703›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2009

Promoter proximal pausing on genes in metazoans.

David S Gilmour

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Toward structural understanding of eukaryotic transcription elongation.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Latency Reversing Agents: Kick and Kill of HTLV-1?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S GilmourCenter for Gene Regulation, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. dsg11@psu.edu
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past two decades of research into transcriptional control of protein-encoding genes in eukaryotes have focused on regulatory mechanisms that act by controlling the recruitment of Pol II to a gene's promoter. Recent genome-wide analyses of the distribution of Pol II indicates that Pol II is concentrated in the promoter regions of thousands of genes in human and Drosophila cells. In many cases, Pol II may have initiated transcription but paused in the promoter proximal region. Hence, release of Pol II from the promoter region into the body of a gene is now recognized as a common rate-limiting step in the control of gene expression. Notably, most genes with paused Pol II are expressed indicating that the pause can be transient. What causes Pol II to concentrate in the promoter region and how it is released to transcribe a gene are the focus of this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression RegulationHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA Polymerase IITranscription, GeneticHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID18830703
OpenAlexW1963848932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.