Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18830571›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2009

Ameliorative effect of combination of benfotiamine and fenofibrate in diabetes-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction and nephropathy in the rat.

Pitchai Balakumar, Vishal Arvind Chakkarwar, Manjeet Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Metabolic Derangement by Arsenic: a Review of the Mechanisms.Biological trace element research · 2024
    Review
  4. Bailing capsule (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Fenofibrate-induced renal dysfunction, yes or no?Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nuclear receptors in renal disease.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2011
    Review
  18. Benfotiamine protects against peritoneal and kidney damage in peritoneal dialysis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pitchai BalakumarCardiovascular Pharmacology Division, ISF College of Pharmacy, Moga 142 001, India. pbala2006@gmail.com
Vishal Arvind Chakkarwar
Manjeet Singh
Indo Soviet Friendship College of Pharmacy · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study has been designed to investigate the effect of benfotiamine and fenofibrate in diabetes-induced experimental vascular endothelial dysfunction (VED) and nephropathy. The single administration of streptozotocin (STZ) (50 mg/kg, i.p.) produced diabetes, which was noted to develop VED and nephropathy in 8 weeks. The diabetes produced VED by attenuating acetylcholine-induced endothelium dependent relaxation, impairing the integrity of vascular endothelium, decreasing serum nitrite/nitrate concentration and increasing serum TBARS and aortic superoxide anion generation. Further, diabetes altered the lipid profile by increasing the serum cholesterol, triglycerides and decreasing the high density lipoprotein. The nephropathy was noted to be developed in the diabetic rat that was assessed in terms of increase in serum creatinine, blood urea, proteinuria, and glomerular damage. The benfotiamine (70 mg/kg, p.o.) and fenofibrate (32 mg/kg, p.o.) or lisinopril (1 mg/kg, p.o., a standard agent) treatments were started in diabetic rats after 1 week of STZ administration and continued for 7 weeks. The treatment with benfotiamine and fenofibrate either alone or in combination attenuated diabetes-induced VED and nephropathy. In addition, the combination of benfotiamine and fenofibrate was noted to be more effective in attenuating the diabetes-induced VED and nephropathy when compared to treatment with either drug alone or lisinopril. Treatment with fenofibrate normalizes the altered lipid profile in diabetic rats, whereas benfotiamine treatment has no effect on lipid alteration in diabetic rats. It may be concluded that diabetes-induced oxidative stress, lipids alteration, and consequent development of VED may be responsible for the induction of nephropathy in diabetic rats. Concurrent administration of benfotiamine and fenofibrate may provide synergistic benefits in preventing the development of diabetes-induced nephropathy by reducing the oxidative stress and lipid alteration, preventing the VED and subsequently improving the renal function.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnimalsBlood GlucoseChelating AgentsDiabetes MellitusDiabetic NephropathiesEndothelium, VascularFenofibrateHumansHypolipidemic AgentsLisinoprilOxidative StressProteinuriaRatsRats, WistarAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsbenphothiamineBlood GlucoseChelating AgentsFenofibrateHypolipidemic AgentsLisinoprilSuperoxidesThiamineThiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances

Identifiers

PMID18830571
OpenAlexW2041363234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.