Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18829640›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups.

Cathy Shipman, Marjolein Gysels, Patrick White, Allison Worth, Scott A Murray, Stephen Barclay, Sarah Forrest, Jonathan Shepherd, Jeremy Dale, Steve Dewar and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. End-of-life care conversations with heart failure patients: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrating palliative care into primary healthcare systems: Advocacy efforts, milestones and challenges in Asia.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Cathy ShipmanKing's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Weston Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ. Catherine.shipman@kcl.ac.uk
Marjolein Gysels
Patrick White
Allison Worth
Scott A Murray
Stephen Barclay
Sarah Forrest
Jonathan Shepherd
Jeremy Dale
Steve Dewar
Marilyn Peters
Suzanne White
Alison Richardson
Karl Lorenz
Jonathan Koffman
Irene J Higginson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify major concerns of national and local importance in the provision, commissioning, research, and use of generalist end of life care.

designA national consultation and prioritising exercise using a modified form of the nominal group technique.

participantsHealthcare practitioners, commissioners, academics, and representatives of user and voluntary groups.

settingPrimary and secondary care, specialist palliative care, and academic and voluntary sectors in England and Scotland.

results74% of those invited (210/285) participated. The stage of life to which "end of life care" referred was not understood in a uniform way. Perceptions ranged from a period of more than a year to the last few days of life. Prominent concerns included difficulties in prognosis and the availability of adequate support for patients with advanced non-malignant disease. Generalists in both primary and secondary care were usually caring for only a few patients approaching the end of life at any one time at a point in time. It was therefore challenging to maintain skills and expertise particularly as educational opportunities were often limited. End of life care took place among many other competing and incentivised activities for general practitioners in the community. More needs to be known about models of end of life care and how these can be integrated in a generalist's workload. A greater evidence base is needed about the effectiveness and application of current tools such as the gold standards framework and Liverpool care pathway and about models of palliation in patients with diseases other than cancer.

conclusionsDefinitions of end of life care need clarification and standardisation. A greater evidence base is needed to define models of good practice together with a commitment to provide education and training and adequate resources for service provision. More needs to be known about the context of provision and the influence of competing priorities and incentives.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceConsensusEnglandFamily PracticeGroup ProcessesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterprofessional RelationsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePalliative CarePatient Care TeamPersonnel LoyaltyScotlandTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID18829640
PMCPMC2659492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.