Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18829479›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2008

CpG island methylator phenotype associates with low-degree chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer.

Yu-Wei Cheng, Hanna Pincas, Manny D Bacolod, Gunter Schemmann, Sarah F Giardina, Jianmin Huang, Sandra Barral, Kamran Idrees, Sajid A Khan, Zhaoshi Zeng and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Wei ChengDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Hanna Pincas
Manny D Bacolod
Gunter Schemmann
Sarah F Giardina
Jianmin Huang
Sandra Barral
Kamran Idrees
Sajid A Khan
Zhaoshi Zeng
Shoshana Rosenberg
Daniel A Notterman
Jurg Ott
Philip Paty
Francis Barany
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USPrinceton University · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNColumbia University · US

Funding

NEW METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTIONP01CA065930 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BARANY, FRANCIS · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
IDENTIFYING GENOME CHANGES IN CANCER DEVELOPMENTR01CA081467 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BARANY, FRANCIS · 1998 to 2000
$532k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065930NCI NIH HHS P01 CA 65930NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081467NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 81467NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAberrant promoter methylation and genomic instability occur frequently during colorectal cancer development. CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) has been shown to associate with microsatellite instability, and BRAF mutation and is often found in the right-side colon. Nevertheless, the relative importance of CIMP and chromosomal instability (CIN) for tumorigenesis has yet to be thoroughly investigated in sporadic colorectal cancers. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe determined CIMP in 161 primary colorectal cancers and 66 matched normal mucosae using a quantitative bisulfite/PCR/ligase detection reaction (LDR)/Universal Array assay. The validity of CIMP was confirmed in a subset of 60 primary tumors using MethyLight assay and five independent markers. In parallel, CIN was analyzed in the same study cohort using Affymetrix 50K Human Mapping arrays.

resultsThe identified CIMP-positive cancers correlate with microsatellite instability (P = 0.075) and the BRAF mutation V600E (P = 0.00005). The array-based high-resolution analysis of chromosomal aberrations indicated that the degree of aneuploidy is spread over a wide spectrum among analyzed colorectal cancers. Whether CIN was defined by copy number variations in selected microsatellite loci (criterion 1) or considered as a continuous variable (criterion 2), CIMP-positive samples showed a strong correlation with low-degree chromosomal aberrations (P = 0.075 and P = 0.012, respectively). Similar correlations were observed when CIMP was determined by MethyLight assay (P = 0.001 and P = 0.013, respectively).

conclusionCIMP-positive tumors generally possess lower chromosomal aberrations, which may only be revealed using a genome-wide approach. The significant difference in the degree of chromosomal aberrations between CIMP-positive and the remainder of samples suggests that epigenetic (CIMP) and genetic (CIN) abnormalities may arise from independent molecular mechanisms of tumor progression.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMutationChromosomal InstabilityColorectal NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPhenotypeProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID18829479
PMCPMC3268558
OpenAlexW2165533667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.