Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18826783›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2008

Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses: a qualitative study.

Wendy McGregor, Hussein Jabareen, Catherine A O'Donnell, Stewart W Mercer, Graham Cm Watt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A qualitative study exploring the experience of the partners of cancer survivors and their views on the role of primary care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Article
  13. Experience of contractual change in UK general practice: a qualitative study of salaried GPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  14. Delivering a national programme of anticipatory care in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Interpretive medicine: Supporting generalism in a changing primary care world.Occasional paper (Royal College of General Practitioners) · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendy McGregorThe Calderwood Practice, Alison Lea Medical Centre, East Kilbride.
Hussein Jabareen
Catherine A O'Donnell
Stewart W Mercer
Graham Cm Watt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe new GMS contract has led to practice nurses playing an important role in the delivery of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).

aimThis study investigated how practice nurses perceive the changes in their work since the contract's inception. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative approach, sampling practice nurses from practices in areas of high and low deprivation, with a range of QOF scores.

settingGlasgow, UK.

methodIndividual interviews were conducted, audiotaped, transcribed, and analysed using a thematic approach.

resultsThree themes emerged: roles and incentives, workload, and patient care. Practice nurses were positive about the development of their professional role since the introduction of the new GMS contract but had mixed views about whether their status had changed. Views on incentives (largely related to financial rewards) also varied, but most felt under-rewarded, irrespective of practice QOF achievement. All reported a substantial increase in workload, related to incentivised QOF domains with greater 'box ticking' and data entry, and less time to spend with patients. Although the structure created by the new contract was generally welcomed, many were unconvinced that it improved patient care and felt other important areas of care were neglected. Concern was also expressed about a negative effect of the QOF on holistic care, including ethical concerns and detrimental effects on the patient-nurse relationship, which were regarded as a core value.

conclusionsThe new GMS contract has given practice nurses increased responsibility. However, discontent about how financial gains are distributed and negative impacts on core values may lead to detrimental long-term effects on motivation and morale.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNursesNurse's RoleWorkloadFamily PracticeFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysician-Nurse RelationsScotlandSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID18826783
PMCPMC2553531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.