Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18823697›Full record

GuidelineEuropean urology2009

Recommendations on the use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of lower urinary tract disorders and pelvic floor dysfunctions: a European consensus report.

Apostolos Apostolidis, Prokar Dasgupta, Pierre Denys, Sohier Elneil, Clare J Fowler, Antonella Giannantoni, Gilles Karsenty, Heinrich Schulte-Baukloh, Brigitte Schurch, Jean-Jacques Wyndaele and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European urology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
31.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 316 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Injections for Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A 100 Units versus 200 units for treatment of refractory idiopathic overactive bladder.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Updates of Overactive Bladder in Pediatrics.International neurourology journal · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Apostolos Apostolidis2nd Department of Urology, Papageorgiou Hospital and Centre for Study of Continence and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. zefxis@yahoo.co.uk
Prokar Dasgupta
Pierre Denys
Sohier Elneil
Clare J Fowler
Antonella Giannantoni
Gilles Karsenty
Heinrich Schulte-Baukloh
Brigitte Schurch
Jean-Jacques Wyndaele
European Consensus Panel
University College London · GBAntwerp University Hospital · BEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHôpital Raymond-Poincaré · FRHôpital Sainte-Marguerite · FRSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe increasing body of evidence and number of potential indications for the use of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) in the lower urinary tract (LUT) underlines the pressing need for evidence-based guidelines.

objectiveA European expert panel consensus conference was convened with the main aim of evaluating the evidence and clinical considerations for the use of BoNTs in the treatment of urologic and pelvic-floor disorders and to propose relevant recommendations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The quality of evidence from fully published English-language literature in the PubMed and EMBASE databases was assessed using the European Association of Urology (EAU) levels of evidence (LoE). Recommendations were graded and approved by a unanimous consensus of the panel. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The use of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA) is recommended in the treatment of intractable symptoms of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) or idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO) in adults (grade A). Caution is recommended in IDO because the risk of voiding difficulty and duration of effect have not yet been accurately evaluated. Repeated treatment can be recommended in NDO (grade B). The depth and location for bladder injections should be within the detrusor muscle outside the trigone (grade C). Dosage in children should be determined by body weight, with caution regarding total dose if also being used for treatment of spasticity, and minimum age (grade B). Existing evidence is inconclusive for recommendations in neurogenic detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, bladder pain syndrome, prostate diseases, and pelvic-floor disorders. The use of BoNTA in the LUT with the current dosages and techniques is considered to be safe overall (grade A).

conclusionsThe consensus committee recommends larger placebo-controlled and comparative trials to evaluate the efficacy of single and repeat injections, the duration of effect, the optimal dosage and injection technique, the timing for repeat injection, and the short- and long-term safety of the treatment in LUT and pelvic-floor disorders.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type AHumansMaleNeuromuscular AgentsPelvic FloorProstatismBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID18823697
OpenAlexW2015046581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.