ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2008
[Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw].
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous application of bisphosphonates (BP) represents an established therapeutic strategy of tumor-associated bone metastasis and severe hypercalcemia. Patients can develop osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) as a side effect of this therapy. The diagnosis of ONJ is based on three criteria: a) patients have been or are currently treated with BP; b) a deficiency in wound healing, which is in 70-80% associated with necrotic alveolar bone, characteristically exposed, is present for at least 8 weeks and c) no radiotherapy of the head and neck was performed. The suppression of bone turnover, concomitant with high functional load of the alveolar bone, and the subsequent accumulation of microfractures are considered the main pathologic factors of this disease. The cumulative incidence of ONJ lies approximately between 1 and 10% in oncologic patients, being associated with the antiresorptive potency and the respective molecular structure of the BPs. Patients with multiple myeloma develop ONJ more frequently than patients with other oncological diseases such as metastasizing breast- and prostate cancer, a fact that may also be due to the higher transfusion/injection frequency of BP in these patients. Dental treatment strategies are responsible for the occurrence of ONJ in approximately 80% of cases. Based on a clinical staging, patients can be grouped into three categories and should receive the corresponding treatment regime. Prospective clinical studies are required for a better understanding of etiology and pathogenesis of ONJ to make treatment, risk estimation and prognosis of ONJ more accurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.