ArticlePloS one2008
HIV-1 with multiple CCR5/CXCR4 chimeric receptor use is predictive of immunological failure in infected children.
Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- The Interplay of HIV and Autophagy in Early Infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- HIV-1 Gp120 clade B/C induces a GRP78 driven cytoprotective mechanism in astrocytoma.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Clinical characteristics of pediatric HIV-1 patients treated with first-line antiretroviral therapy in Vietnam: a nested case-control study.International journal of public health · 2017Article
- Host factors and early treatments to restrict paediatric HIV infection and early disease progression.Journal of virus eradication · 2015Review
- Complexity and dynamics of HIV-1 chemokine receptor usage in a multidrug-resistant adolescent.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2014Article
- R5 HIV-1 envelope attracts dendritic cells to cross the human intestinal epithelium and sample luminal virions via engagement of the CCR5.EMBO molecular medicine · 2013Article
- The comparison of genetic variation in the envelope protein between various immunodeficiency viruses and equine infectious anemia virus.Virologica Sinica · 2012Article
- The role of genetic variants of Stromal cell-Derived Factor 1 in pediatric HIV-1 infection and disease progression.PloS one · 2012Article
- The role of HIV replicative fitness in perinatal transmission of HIV.Virologica Sinica · 2011Review
- Clinical significance of HIV-1 coreceptor usage.Journal of translational medicine · 2011Review
- HIV-1 co-receptor usage: influence on mother-to-child transmission and pediatric infection.Journal of translational medicine · 2011Review
- Variation in the biological properties of HIV-1 R5 envelopes: implications of envelope structure, transmission and pathogenesis.Future virology · 2010Article
- Family-centred approaches to the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHIV-1 R5 viruses are characterized by a large phenotypic variation, that is reflected by the mode of coreceptor use. The ability of R5 HIV-1 to infect target cells expressing chimeric receptors between CCR5 and CXCR4 (R5(broad) viruses), was shown to correlate with disease stage in HIV-1 infected adults. Here, we ask the question whether phenotypic variation of R5 viruses could play a role also in mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV-1 and pediatric disease progression. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsViral isolates obtained from a total of 59 HIV-1 seropositive women (24 transmitting and 35 non transmitting) and 28 infected newborn children, were used to infect U87.CD4 cells expressing wild type or six different CCR5/CXCR4 chimeric receptors. HIV-1 isolates obtained from newborn infants had predominantly R5(narrow) phenotype (n = 20), but R5(broad) and R5X4 viruses were also found in seven and one case, respectively. The presence of R5(broad) and R5X4 phenotypes correlated significantly with a severe decline of the CD4+ T cells (CDC stage 3) or death within 2 years of age. Forty-three percent of the maternal R5 isolates displayed an R5(broad) phenotype, however, the presence of the R5(broad) virus was not predictive for MTCT of HIV-1. Of interest, while only 1 of 5 mothers with an R5X4 virus transmitted the dualtropic virus, 5 of 6 mothers carrying R5(broad) viruses transmitted viruses with a similar broad chimeric coreceptor usage. Thus, the maternal R5(broad) phenotype was largely preserved during transmission and could be predictive of the phenotype of the newborn's viral variant. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that R5(broad) viruses are not hampered in transmission. When transmitted, immunological failure occurs earlier than in children infected with HIV-1 of R5(narrow) phenotype. We believe that this finding is of utmost relevance for therapeutic interventions in pediatric HIV-1 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.