Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18820411›Full record

ReviewRestorative neurology and neuroscience2008

Don't fence me in: harnessing the beneficial roles of astrocytes for spinal cord repair.

Robin E White, Lyn B Jakeman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Neurological Manifestations of Perinatal Dengue.Newborn (Clarksville, Md.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Axon Regeneration: A Subcellular Extension in Multiple Dimensions.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin E WhiteNeuroscience Graduate Studies Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Lyn B Jakeman
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Ohio State Neuroscience Centr CoreP30NS045758 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCTIGUE, DANA M · 2004 to 2015
$7.7M
Axons and the Extracellular Matrix in Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS043246 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCTIGUE, DANA M · 2004 to 2015
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-043246NINDS NIH HHS NS-045758NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS045758NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes comprise a heterogeneous cell population that plays a complex role in repair after spinal cord injury. Reactive astrocytes are major contributors to the glial scar that is a physical and chemical barrier to axonal regeneration. Yet, consistent with a supportive role in development, astrocytes secrete neurotrophic factors and protect neurons and glia spared by the injury. In development and after injury, local cues are modulators of astrocyte phenotype and function. When multipotent cells are transplanted into the injured spinal cord, they differentiate into astrocytes and other glial cells as opposed to neurons, which is commonly viewed as a challenge to be overcome in developing stem cell technology. However, several examples show that astrocytes provide support and guidance for axonal growth and aid in improving functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Notably, transplantation of astrocytes of a developmentally immature phenotype promotes tissue sparing and axonal regeneration. Furthermore, interventions that enhance endogenous astrocyte migration or reinvasion of the injury site result in greater axonal growth. These studies demonstrate that astrocytes are dynamic, diverse cells that have the capacity to promote axon growth after injury. The ability of astrocytes to be supportive of recovery should be exploited in devising regenerative strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesBrain Tissue TransplantationCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationGrowth ConesHumansNerve RegenerationSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID18820411
PMCPMC2825119
OpenAlexW2138201366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.