Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18818760›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2008

Sex-specific genetic structure and social organization in Central Asia: insights from a multi-locus study.

Laure Ségurel, Begoña Martínez-Cruz, Lluis Quintana-Murci, Patricia Balaresque, Myriam Georges, Tatiana Hegay, Almaz Aldashev, Firuza Nasyrova, Mark A Jobling, Evelyne Heyer and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. From matrimonial practices to genetic diversity in Southeast Asian populations: the signature of the matrilineal puzzle.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laure SégurelMuséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 5145, Université Paris 7, Eco-Anthropologie et Ethnobiologie, Musée de l'Homme, Paris, France. lsegurel@mnhn.fr
Begoña Martínez-Cruz
Lluis Quintana-Murci
Patricia Balaresque
Myriam Georges
Tatiana Hegay
Almaz Aldashev
Firuza Nasyrova
Mark A Jobling
Evelyne Heyer
Renaud Vitalis

Funding

Wellcome Trust 057559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the non-recombining portion of the Y chromosome (NRY) have been extensively used in order to measure the maternally and paternally inherited genetic structure of human populations, and to infer sex-specific demography and history. Most studies converge towards the notion that among populations, women are genetically less structured than men. This has been mainly explained by a higher migration rate of women, due to patrilocality, a tendency for men to stay in their birthplace while women move to their husband's house. Yet, since population differentiation depends upon the product of the effective number of individuals within each deme and the migration rate among demes, differences in male and female effective numbers and sex-biased dispersal have confounding effects on the comparison of genetic structure as measured by uniparentally inherited markers. In this study, we develop a new multi-locus approach to analyze jointly autosomal and X-linked markers in order to aid the understanding of sex-specific contributions to population differentiation. We show that in patrilineal herder groups of Central Asia, in contrast to bilineal agriculturalists, the effective number of women is higher than that of men. We interpret this result, which could not be obtained by the analysis of mtDNA and NRY alone, as the consequence of the social organization of patrilineal populations, in which genetically related men (but not women) tend to cluster together. This study suggests that differences in sex-specific migration rates may not be the only cause of contrasting male and female differentiation in humans, and that differences in effective numbers do matter.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationPopulation DynamicsSocial EnvironmentAdultAsia, CentralChromosomes, Human, YComputer SimulationDNA, MitochondrialEmigration and ImmigrationFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSex FactorsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID18818760
PMCPMC2535577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.