Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18818722›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2008

Protein meta-functional signatures from combining sequence, structure, evolution, and amino acid property information.

Kai Wang, Jeremy A Horst, Gong Cheng, David C Nickle, Ram Samudrala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. An overview of the prediction of protein DNA-binding sites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  8. Basis for substrate recognition and distinction by matrix metalloproteinases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Structure prediction of partial-length protein sequences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolution: a guide to perturb protein function and networks.Current opinion in structural biology · 2010
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kai WangDepartment of Microbiology, Computational Genomics Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jeremy A Horst
Gong Cheng
David C Nickle
Ram Samudrala

Funding

Protein structure from theory and experimentR33GM068152 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAMUDRALA, RAM · 2003 to 2005
$901k
Individual Predoctoral Dental Scientist FellowshipF30DE017522 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORST, JEREMY ALAN · 2006 to 2010
$173k
NIDCR NIH HHS F30 DE017522NIDCR NIH HHS F30DE017522-02NIGMS NIH HHS GM068152-01NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM068152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein function is mediated by different amino acid residues, both their positions and types, in a protein sequence. Some amino acids are responsible for the stability or overall shape of the protein, playing an indirect role in protein function. Others play a functionally important role as part of active or binding sites of the protein. For a given protein sequence, the residues and their degree of functional importance can be thought of as a signature representing the function of the protein. We have developed a combination of knowledge- and biophysics-based function prediction approaches to elucidate the relationships between the structural and the functional roles of individual residues and positions. Such a meta-functional signature (MFS), which is a collection of continuous values representing the functional significance of each residue in a protein, may be used to study proteins of known function in greater detail and to aid in experimental characterization of proteins of unknown function. We demonstrate the superior performance of MFS in predicting protein functional sites and also present four real-world examples to apply MFS in a wide range of settings to elucidate protein sequence-structure-function relationships. Our results indicate that the MFS approach, which can combine multiple sources of information and also give biological interpretation to each component, greatly facilitates the understanding and characterization of protein function.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseComputational BiologyComputer SimulationConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinEvolution, MolecularInternetModels, ChemicalModels, GeneticMolecular StructureMutagenesis, Site-DirectedAmino AcidsBacterial ProteinsCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseOrnithine DecarboxylaseProteins

Identifiers

PMID18818722
PMCPMC2526173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.