Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18818721›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2008

Structural biology by NMR: structure, dynamics, and interactions.

Phineus R L Markwick, Thérèse Malliavin, Michael Nilges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cryo-Electron Microscopy in the Study of Antiviral Innate Immunity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. AI-Driven Deep Learning Techniques in Protein Structure Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. DNA G-quadruplex-stabilizing metal complexes as anticancer drugs.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Implementing Digital-Waveform Technology for ExtendedJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Phineus R L MarkwickDépartement de Biologie Structurale et Chimie, Institut Pasteur, Unité de Bio-Informatique Structurale, CNRS URA 2185, Paris, France.
Thérèse Malliavin
Michael Nilges

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The function of bio-macromolecules is determined by both their 3D structure and conformational dynamics. These molecules are inherently flexible systems displaying a broad range of dynamics on time-scales from picoseconds to seconds. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has emerged as the method of choice for studying both protein structure and dynamics in solution. Typically, NMR experiments are sensitive both to structural features and to dynamics, and hence the measured data contain information on both. Despite major progress in both experimental approaches and computational methods, obtaining a consistent view of structure and dynamics from experimental NMR data remains a challenge. Molecular dynamics simulations have emerged as an indispensable tool in the analysis of NMR data.

Indexed as

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalMacromolecular SubstancesModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularMolecular BiologyMolecular ConformationMolecular StructureProteinsThermodynamicsMacromolecular SubstancesProteins

Identifiers

PMID18818721
PMCPMC2518859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.