ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2008
Progressing toward data intimacy: a review of within-session data analysis.
Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relational Databases for Behavior Science.Perspectives on behavior science · 2025Article
- The Performance-based IISCA Can Inform Effective and Socially Meaningful Skill-based Treatment.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- A preliminary analysis of teaching children with autism spectrum disorder self-protection skills for bullying situations.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2025Article
- Quantitative Techniques and Graphical Representations for Interpreting Results from Alternating Treatment Design.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- Calibration of observational measurement of rate of responding.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2011Article
- Consistent visual analyses of intrasubject data.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2010Article
- Psychotropic drug treatments for people with autism and other developmental disorders: a primer for practicing behavior analysts.Behavior analysis in practice · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual inspection of data is a common method for understanding, responding to, and communicating important behavior-environment relations in single-subject research. In a field that was once dominated by cumulative, moment-to-moment records of behavior, a number of graphic forms currently exist that aggregate data into larger units. In this paper, we describe the continuum of aggregation that ranges from distant to intimate displays of behavioral data. To aid in an understanding of the conditions under which a more intimate analysis is warranted (i.e., one that provides a richer analysis than that provided by condition or session aggregates), we review a sample of research articles for which within-session data depiction has enhanced the visual analysis of applied behavioral research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.