Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18816605›Full record

ArticleCancer2008

Epithelial and pseudoepithelial differentiation in glioblastoma and gliosarcoma: a comparative morphologic and molecular genetic study.

Fausto J Rodriguez, Bernd W Scheithauer, Caterina Giannini, Sandra C Bryant, Robert B Jenkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Next-Generation Sequencing of a Glioblastoma with True Epithelial Differentiation.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Iranian journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Glioblastomas exploit truncated OProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Clinicopathologic features and prognosis of epithelioid glioblastoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
  18. Clinical and Molecular Characterization of Adult Glioblastomas in Southern Brazil.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fausto J RodriguezDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. rodriguez.fausto@mayo.edu
Bernd W Scheithauer
Caterina Giannini
Sandra C Bryant
Robert B Jenkins
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Research Training Program in Neuro-OncologyT32NS007494 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI O'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICK · 2002 to 2014
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007494NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS-07494-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastomas exhibit a remarkable tendency toward morphologic diversity. Although rare, pseudoepithelial components (adenoid or epithelioid) or true epithelial differentiation may occur, posing a significant diagnostic challenge.

methodsHematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were reviewed, and immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed.

resultsThe patients included 38 men and 20 women. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50 years-67 years), and the median overall survival was 7 months (IQR, 4 months-11 months). "Adenoid" glioblastomas (A-GBM) predominated (48%). True epithelial glioblastomas (TE-GBM) were next most frequent based on morphology and immunohistochemistry (35%), followed by epithelioid glioblastomas (E-GBM) (17%). Overall, 25 (43%) tumors featured a sarcomatous component. Molecular cytogenetic abnormalities identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization in A-GBM, E-GBM, and TE-GBM, respectively, included p16 deletion/-9 (60%, 71%, 64%); chromosome 10 loss (40%, 63%, 57%), chromosome 7 gain without EGFR amplification (70%, 38%, 40%), EGFR amplification (10%, 50%, 27%), PTEN deletion (10%, 25%, 29%), PDGFRA amplification (10%, 25%, 0%), and RB1 deletion/-13q (50%, 0%, 14%). Abnormalities identified by immunohistochemistry included p21 immunonegativity (60%, 25%, 93%), which was most frequent in TE-GBM (P = .008), strong nuclear p53 staining (29%, 29%, 41%), strong membranous staining for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (21%, 63%, 19%), which was most frequent in E-GBM (P = .03), and an increased frequency of p27 immunonegativity in gliosarcomas (15% negative, 85% focal) compared with tumors without sarcoma (38% strongly positive) (P = .009).

conclusionsPseudoepithelial and true epithelial morphology are rare phenomena in GBM and may be associated with a similar poor prognosis. These tumors demonstrate proportions of molecular genetic abnormalities varying somewhat from conventional GBM.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAgedBrain NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGlioblastomaGliosarcomaHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedTissue Array Analysis

Identifiers

PMID18816605
PMCPMC2597667
OpenAlexW2055331277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.