ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008
Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Pooled it
- A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.The patient · 2014Pooled it
- Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2011Pooled it
- Improving the quality of prison research: A qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Trial
- Differences between Patient and Surgeon Interests in Musculoskeletal Research.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2021Article
- Value, transparency, and inclusion: A values-based study of patient involvement in musculoskeletal research.PloS one · 2021Article
- Using a citizens' jury approach to determine a good nutrition resource for pregnant women.Public health nutrition · 2020Article
- Developing a national health research agenda for Lao PDR: prioritising the research needs of stakeholders.Global health action · 2020Article
- Addressing Health Disparities Through Deliberative Methods: Citizens' Panels for Health Equity.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Multi-cellular engineered living systems: building a community around responsible research on emergence.Biofabrication · 2019Article
- Patient and public involvement: Two sides of the same coin or different coins altogether?Bioethics · 2019Article
- User involvement in digital health: Working together to design smart home health technology.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Article
- Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review.Frontiers in sociology · 2019Review
- Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- Genuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality.Journal of community genetics · 2018Article
- What's Involved with Wanting to Be Involved? Comparing Expectations for Public Engagement in Health Policy across Research and Care Contexts.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2017Article
- CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Article
- Priority setting in research: user led mental health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2017Article
- Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?BMC public health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvolving members of the public in setting priorities for health research in becoming increasingly common practice. One method used in public involvement exercises is the citizens' jury.
objectiveThis article examines some challenges and benefits of citizens' juries, including issues relating to process, public engagement and outcome.
designIn Bristol, UK, a citizens' jury was held with the aim of identifying local priorities for research into health and social care. This jury is used as an example through which key issues in public involvement and jury processes are explored. SETTING AND
participantsThe Bristol Citizens' Jury comprised 20 members of the public ('jurors'), an oversight panel and a steering group. The jurors met at 11 consecutive sessions during 2006 over a period of 16 weeks, which culminated in a written report. All the sessions were audio-recorded, five sessions were observed and video-recorded, and 16 jurors completed written feedback forms at the end of the jury process. FINDINGS AND
conclusionIn this article we discuss degree and timing of public involvement in the process of health research; the role of context; representation of communities; processes of deliberation and knowledge production; and how constraints of time and cost may affect public involvement. It was clear that jurors who took part in the Bristol Citizens' Jury were engaged and committed. This engagement may be related to jurors' belief in their ability to shape future research alongside concern about the relevance of the issues under discussion. Opposing emotions of tension and harmony are a crucial part of the deliberation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.