Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18816318›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2008

When doctors disagree: a qualitative study of doctors' and parents' views on the risks of childhood food allergy.

Wendy Hu, Carol Grbich, Andrew Kemp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parent experiences with paediatric allergy pathways in the West Midlands: A qualitative study.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence of reported food allergies in Brazilian preschoolers living in a small Brazilian city.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: an Update.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Expectations, hopes and moral norms.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article
  12. Fatal Anaphylaxis: Mortality Rate and Risk Factors.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy HuWestern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. wendyhu@med.usyd.edu.au
Carol Grbich
Andrew Kemp
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUFlinders University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the views of doctors which underpin clinical practice variation concerning an uncertain health risk, and the views of parents who had sought advice from these doctors, using the example of childhood food allergy. STUDY

designQualitative study involving in-depth interviews and participant observation over 16 months. Focus groups and consultation audio-recordings provided corroborative data.

settingThree specialist allergy clinics located in one metropolitan area.

participantsEighteen medical specialists and trainees in allergy, and 85 parents (from 69 families) with food allergic children.

resultsDoctors expressed a spectrum of views. The most divergent views were characterized by: scientific scepticism rather than precaution in response to uncertainty; emphasis on quantifiable physical evidence rather than parental histories; professional roles as providers of physical diagnosis and treatment rather than of information and advocacy; libertarian rather than communitarian perspectives on responsibility for risk; and values about allergy as a disease and normal childhood. Parents held a similar, but less divergent range of views. The majority of parents preferred more moderate doctors' views, with 43% (30 of 69) of families expressing their dissatisfaction by seeking another specialist opinion. Many were confused by variation in doctors' opinions, preferring relationships with doctors that recognized their concerns, addressed their information needs, and confirmed that they were managing their child's allergy appropriately.

conclusionsIn uncertain clinical situations, parents do not expect absolute certainty from doctors; inflexible certainty may not allow parental preferences to be acknowledged or accommodated, and is associated with the seeking of second opinions.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDissent and DisputesPatient SatisfactionRisk AssessmentUncertaintyAllergy and ImmunologyAnaphylaxisAustraliaChildDecision MakingFemaleFood HypersensitivityHumansMaleMoralsParents

Identifiers

PMID18816318
PMCPMC5060450
OpenAlexW2061370402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.