ArticlePLoS medicine2008
Ethical and practical issues associated with aggregating databases.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing partnership-driven clinical federated electronic health record data sharing networks.International journal of medical informatics · 2016Article
- Big Data: the challenge for small research groups in the era of cancer genomics.British journal of cancer · 2015Review
- How to build an integrated biobank: the Washington University Translational Cardiovascular Biobank & Repository experience.Clinical and translational science · 2013Article
- Navigating legal constraints in clinical data warehousing: a case study in personalized medicine.Interface focus · 2013Article
- Ethical issues in health research with novel online sources.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Bioethical considerations in developing a biorepository for the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health project.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012Review
- Building a diabetes screening population data repository using electronic medical records.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2011Article
- Establishing a follow-up of the Swiss MONICA participants (1984-1993): record linkage with census and mortality data.BMC public health · 2010Article
- Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2010Article
- Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries.BMC medical ethics · 2010Review
- Meeting the governance challenges of next-generation biorepository research.Science translational medicine · 2010Article
- Technical and policy approaches to balancing patient privacy and data sharing in clinical and translational research.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2010Article
- Data sharing in genomics--re-shaping scientific practice.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009Review
- Progress Toward Cancer Data Ecosystems.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
- iDASH: integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharing.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.