ArticleCurrent microbiology2009
Effect of the inoculum size on carbapenem susceptibilities of beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae.
Article in Current microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2019Review
- Cation concentration variability of four distinct Mueller-Hinton agar brands influences polymyxin B susceptibility results.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A higher inoculum size of beta-lactamase-positive Haemophilus influenzae is reported to increase minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for beta-lactams. However, the effect of inoculum size of beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae (BLNAR) on MICs for carbapenems has not been investigated. This study evaluated the effect of inoculum size on MICs for carbapenems and other beta-lactams in nine clinical isolates of BLNAR. The MICs were determined by both the standard method described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (final inoculum size of 5 x 10(5) colony-forming units [CFU]/ml) and a modified method (final inoculum size of 5 x 10(6) CFU/ml) using viable cell counts. The findings showed that the higher inoculum size increased MICs for imipenem, meropenem, panipenem, biapenem, ampicillin, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone. The inoculum effect (4 log(2) dilution or a greater increase in the MIC) with imipenem, meropenem, panipenem, and biapenem was found in three, five, two, and two isolates, respectively. The magnitude of the inoculum effect for panipenem significantly increased with the levels of MICs, but correlation between them for the others was not statistically significant. The mutations of penicillin-binding protein genes had little relevance to the reduced susceptibility to carbapenems or to the magnitude of the inoculum effect. These results suggest that MIC determination using turbidity can produce interpretive errors in the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of BLNAR for carbapenems because of their inoculum effect. Thus, accurate adjustment of inoculum size, such as viable cell count, is helpful for confirming the true MICs when the isolates are interpreted as "resistant" by turbidity-based MIC determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.