Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18815817›Full record

Trial reportPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2009

Ureteric jet Doppler waveform: is it a reliable predictor of vesicoureteric reflux in children?

Damjana Kljucevsek, Tomaz Kljucevsek, Tanja Kersnik Levart, Rajko B Kenda

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Detecting reflux: does ureteric jet Doppler waveform have a role?Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Damjana KljucevsekPaediatric Radiology Unit, University Medical Centre, Vrazov trg 1, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. damjana.kljucevsek@siol.net
Tomaz Kljucevsek
Tanja Kersnik Levart
Rajko B Kenda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of our prospective study was to find out whether ureteric jet Doppler waveform (UJDW) could be a reliable predictor of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children, compared with echo-enhanced voiding ultrasonography (VUS). Echo-enhanced VUS was performed in 75 children, 57 girls and 18 boys, aged 3 years to 12 years, following the accepted indications for this procedure. During the same procedure the measurement of UJDW was also performed and was considered to be successful (in 70 children) when at least ten UJDWs were recorded per ureteric unit. Depending on the shape of the UJDWs, the sequences were classified into three groups: monophasic, suggestive of VUR; complex, not suggestive of VUR; and mixed sequence, suggestive of VUR when a certain ratio between monophasic and complex UJDWs was achieved. When all three sequences were taken into account, the overall sensitivity and specificity of this method in detecting VUR were 88.5% and 82.3%, respectively. These values seem high enough for this method to be considered as a good alternative to invasive micturating cystographies in screening children for VUR.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRadiographyReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, DopplerUreterUrinationVesico-Ureteral Reflux

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.