ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2008
Droplet-based microdialysis-Concept, theory, and design considerations.
Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Microfabricated, amperometric, enzyme-based biosensors for in vivo applications.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The capability of continuously sampling the extracellular fluid opens up a wide range of applications of microdialysis in biological, pharmaceutical, and clinical studies. Existing microdialysis, however, faces challenges in sampling analytes with fast clearance and limited diffusivity because sampling resolution is limited by device size. Size reduction in probes and interconnected cannulae is a promising solution to improve temporal and spatial resolution. But the back pressure produced by resistance to laminar flows will be magnified in smaller channels, raising a concern as to whether it is feasible to operate continuous perfusion for miniaturized microdialysis. We demonstrate that a 10-fold smaller channel will exhibit 100-fold larger back pressure in response to the increase in the flow rate to maintain the relative recovery. In order to overcome the foreseen back pressure issue, this paper discusses a new concept using discrete droplets instead of continuous flows to operate dialysis in a miniaturized probe. This conceptual design is referred to as droplet-based digital microdialysis, in which droplets are produced, controlled and advanced within microchannels at a rate that in theory should allow for analytes to equilibrate with the extracellular fluid under no flow conditions. Expecting that a digital droplet design will entirely eliminate back pressure by introducing air between droplets, we numerically compare the equilibration kinematics of droplets to that of continuous flow. Results suggest equilibration of low molecular weight analytes between intermittently stationary droplets and the extracellular fluid in a few seconds. Considerations in design, prototyping, calibration and quantification, and the integration with other devices are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.