ArticleCellular and molecular neurobiology2009
The binding of donepezil with external mouth of K+-channels of molluscan neurons.
Article in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earlier, we have shown a strong inhibitory effect of donepezil on K+-current of molluscan neurons (Solntseva et al., Comp Biochem Physiol 144, 319-326, 2007). In the present work, a possible interaction of donepezil with the external mouth of the channel was examined using, as a tool, tetraethylammonium (TEA), a classical antagonist of potassium channels. Experiments were conducted in isolated neurons of snail Helix aspersa using the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique. A high-threshold slow-inactivating K+-current involving Ca2+-dependent (I (C)) and Ca2+-independent (I (K)) components was recorded. The I (C) was estimated at 30 mV, and I (K) at 100 mV. The IC(50) values for blocking effect of donepezil on I (C) varied from 5.0 to 8.9 microM in different cells. Corresponding values for I (K) varied from 4.9 to 9.9 microM. The IC(50) values for blocking effect of TEA on I (C) lied in the range of 200 to 910 microM, and on I (K) lied in the range of 100 to 990 microM. The comparison of the effects of donepezil and TEA on the same cells revealed significant correlation between IC(50) values of these effects. The value of Spearman coefficient of correlation (r) was 0.77 for I (C) (P < 0.05), and 0.82 for I (K) (P < 0.05). In the presence of TEA, the effect of donepezil, both on I (C) and I (K), appears significantly weaker than in control solution. Dose-response curves of donepezil effect both on I (C) and I (K) were shifted right along horizontal axis when donepezil was applied in combination with TEA. Results suggest that TEA interferes with donepezil and precludes the occupation by donepezil of its own site. We suppose that the site for donepezil is situated near the TEA site with possible overlap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.