Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18810508›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2009

Candida albicans adhesion to composite resin materials.

Ralf Bürgers, Wulf Schneider-Brachert, Martin Rosentritt, Gerhard Handel, Sebastian Hahnel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond roughness: Lateral surface architecture drives Candida albicans virulence on denture polymers.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of S. Mutans and S. Sanguinis on Growth and Adhesion of P. Gingivalis and Their Ability to Adhere to Different Dental Materials.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  15. Evaluation ofThe journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ralf BürgersDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, Regensburg University Medical Centre, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee, 93042 Regensburg, Germany. ralf.buergers@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
Wulf Schneider-Brachert
Martin Rosentritt
Gerhard Handel
Sebastian Hahnel
University Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adhesion of Candida albicans to dental restorative materials in the human oral cavity may promote the occurrence of oral candidosis. This study aimed to compare the susceptibility of 14 commonly used composite resin materials (two compomers, one ormocer, one novel silorane, and ten conventional hybrid composites) to adhere Candida albicans. Differences in the amount of adhering fungi should be related to surface roughness, hydrophobicity, and the type of matrix. Cylindrical specimens of each material were made according to the manufacturers' instructions. Surface roughness R (a) was assessed by perthometer measurements and the degree of hydrophobicity by computerized contact angle analysis. Specimens were incubated with a reference strain of C. albicans (DMSZ 1386), and adhering fungi were quantified by using a bioluminometric assay in combination with an automated plate reader. Statistical differences were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated to assess correlations. Median R (a) of the tested composite resin materials ranged between 0.04 and 0.23 microm, median contact angles between 69.2 degrees and 86.9 degrees . The two compomers and the ormocer showed lower luminescence intensities indicating less adhesion of fungi than all tested conventional hybrid composites. No conclusive correlation was found between surface roughness, hydrophobicity, and the amount of adhering C. albicans.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionComposite ResinsCandida albicansColony Count, MicrobialCompomersDental Restoration, PermanentHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLuminescent MeasurementsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSurface PropertiesCompomersComposite Resins

Identifiers

PMID18810508
OpenAlexW1973245728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.