Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18809791›Full record

SynthesisHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2008

Changes in home versus clinic blood pressure with antihypertensive treatments: a meta-analysis.

Joji Ishikawa, Deirdre J Carroll, Sujith Kuruvilla, Joseph E Schwartz, Thomas G Pickering

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.European cardiology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joji IshikawaDepartment of Medicine, Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York 10032, USA.
Deirdre J Carroll
Sujith Kuruvilla
Joseph E Schwartz
Thomas G Pickering
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH E · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
MIND-BODY-BEHAVIORAL MED CLINICAL TRIALS INFRASTRUCTURER24HL076857 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIDSON, KARINA W. · 2004 to 2008
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL 47540NHLBI NIH HHS R24 HL076857NHLBI NIH HHS R24HL76857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring is recommended for assessing the effects of antihypertensive treatment, but it is not clear how the treatment-induced changes in HBP compare with the changes in clinic blood pressure (CBP). We searched PubMed using the terms "home or self-measured blood pressure," and selected articles in which the changes in CBP and HBP (using the upper arm oscillometric method) induced by antihypertensive drugs were presented. We performed a systematic review of 30 articles published before March 2008 that included a total of 6794 subjects. As there was significant heterogeneity in most of the outcomes, a random effects model was used for the meta-analyses. The mean changes (+/-SE) in CBP and HBP (systolic/diastolic) were -15.2+/-0.03/-10.3+/-0.03 mm Hg and -12.2+/-0.04/-8.0+/-0.04 mm Hg respectively, although there were wide varieties of differences in the reduction between HBP and CBP. The reductions in CBP were correlated with those of HBP (systolic BP; r=0.66, B=0.48, diastolic BP; r=0.71, B=0.52, P<0.001). In 7 studies that also included 24-hour BP monitoring, the reduction of HBP was greater than that of 24-hour BP in systolic (HBP; -12.6+/-0.06 mm Hg, 24-hour BP; -11.9+/-0.04 mm Hg, P<0.001). In 5 studies that included daytime and nighttime systolic BP separately, HBP decreased 15% more than daytime ambulatory BP and 30% more than nighttime ambulatory BP. In conclusion, HBP falls approximately 20% less than CBP with antihypertensive treatments. Daytime systolic BP falls 15% less and nighttime systolic BP falls 30% less than home systolic BP.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18809791
PMCPMC4593654
OpenAlexW2170707021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.