SynthesisHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2008
Changes in home versus clinic blood pressure with antihypertensive treatments: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Power to identify a genetic predictor of antihypertensive drug response using different methods to measure blood pressure response.Journal of translational medicine · 2012Trial
- Comparison of office, ambulatory, and home blood pressure antihypertensive response to atenolol and hydrochlorthiazide.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2010Trial
- Prognostic value of home blood pressure monitoring in patients under antihypertensive treatment.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Article
- Assessing the Utility of a Novel SMS- and Phone-Based System for Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients: Feasibility Study.JMIR cardio · 2017Article
- Home Blood Pressure Monitoring.European cardiology · 2015Review
- Advantages of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Assessing the Efficacy of Antihypertensive Therapy.Cardiology and therapy · 2015Article
- Interpreting treatment-induced blood pressure reductions measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Journal of human hypertension · 2013Review
- Outcome-driven thresholds for home blood pressure measurement: international database of home blood pressure in relation to cardiovascular outcome.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2013Article
- Hypertension and atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic implications.Journal of human hypertension · 2012Review
- Carotid baroreceptor activation for the treatment of resistant hypertension and heart failure.Current hypertension reports · 2012Review
- Self blood pressure monitoring: a worthy substitute for ambulatory blood pressure?Journal of human hypertension · 2010Article
- Home blood pressure measurements for managing hypertension in hemodialysis patients.American journal of nephrology · 2009Article
- The role of home BP monitoring: Answers to 10 common questions.The Journal of family practiceReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring is recommended for assessing the effects of antihypertensive treatment, but it is not clear how the treatment-induced changes in HBP compare with the changes in clinic blood pressure (CBP). We searched PubMed using the terms "home or self-measured blood pressure," and selected articles in which the changes in CBP and HBP (using the upper arm oscillometric method) induced by antihypertensive drugs were presented. We performed a systematic review of 30 articles published before March 2008 that included a total of 6794 subjects. As there was significant heterogeneity in most of the outcomes, a random effects model was used for the meta-analyses. The mean changes (+/-SE) in CBP and HBP (systolic/diastolic) were -15.2+/-0.03/-10.3+/-0.03 mm Hg and -12.2+/-0.04/-8.0+/-0.04 mm Hg respectively, although there were wide varieties of differences in the reduction between HBP and CBP. The reductions in CBP were correlated with those of HBP (systolic BP; r=0.66, B=0.48, diastolic BP; r=0.71, B=0.52, P<0.001). In 7 studies that also included 24-hour BP monitoring, the reduction of HBP was greater than that of 24-hour BP in systolic (HBP; -12.6+/-0.06 mm Hg, 24-hour BP; -11.9+/-0.04 mm Hg, P<0.001). In 5 studies that included daytime and nighttime systolic BP separately, HBP decreased 15% more than daytime ambulatory BP and 30% more than nighttime ambulatory BP. In conclusion, HBP falls approximately 20% less than CBP with antihypertensive treatments. Daytime systolic BP falls 15% less and nighttime systolic BP falls 30% less than home systolic BP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.