Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18809664›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2008

Protection of wild-type and severe combined immunodeficiency mice against an intranasal challenge by passive immunization with monoclonal antibodies to the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis major outer membrane protein.

Sukumar Pal, Jose Bravo, Ellena M Peterson, Luis M de la Maza

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expert review of vaccines · 2021
    Article
  6. Protection of outbred mice against a vaginal challenge by aHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Update on Chlamydia trachomatis Vaccinology.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sukumar PalDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Sciences, Rm. D440, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4800, USA.
Jose Bravo
Ellena M Peterson
Luis M de la Maza
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Recombinant C. trachomatis vaccineR01AI067888 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DE LA MAZA, LUIS M · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS AI-67888NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) major outer membrane protein (MOMP) were characterized for their ability to neutralize the infectivity of this organism in vitro and in vivo. One of the MAbs (MoPn-23) recognizes a nonlinear epitope in the MOMP, MAb MoPn-40 binds to a linear epitope in the variable domain 1 (VD1), and MAb MoPn-32 recognizes the chlamydial lipopolysaccharide. MAb MoPn-23 neutralized 50% of the infectivity of Chlamydia, as measured in vitro by using HAK (Fc gammaIII(-)) and HeLa-229 (Fc gammaIII(+)) cells at a concentration 100 times lower than MAb MoPn-40. MAb MoPn-32 had no neutralizing ability. In comparison to the control normal mouse immunoglobulin G, passive immunization of BALB/c mice with MAb MoPn-23 resulted in a highly significant protection against an intranasal (i.n.) challenge as determined by the change in body weight, the weight of the lungs, and the yield of Chlamydia inclusion-forming units (IFU) from the lungs. Passive immunization with MAb MoPn-40 resulted in a lower degree of protection, and MAb MoPn-32 afforded no protection. MAb MoPn-23 was also tested for its ability to protect wild-type (WT) and severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) C.B-17 mice against an i.n. challenge. Protection based on total body weight, lung weight, and yield of Chlamydia IFU was as effective in SCID as in WT C.B-17 mice. In conclusion, antibodies to MOMP can protect mice against a chlamydial infection in the presence or absence of T and B cells.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBlotting, WesternChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHeLa CellsHumansImmunization, PassiveMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, SCIDPorinsAntibodies, Monoclonalomp1 protein, Chlamydia trachomatisPorins

Identifiers

PMID18809664
PMCPMC2583570
OpenAlexW2161879892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.