Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18809622›Full record

Trial reportDiabetes care2008

Improving Diabetes Care in Practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial.

Kevin A Peterson, David M Radosevich, Patrick J O'Connor, John A Nyman, Ronald J Prineas, Steven A Smith, Thomas J Arneson, Victor A Corbett, Joyce C Weinhandl, Carol J Lange and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes care, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kevin A PetersonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. peter223@umn.edu
David M Radosevich
Patrick J O'Connor
John A Nyman
Ronald J Prineas
Steven A Smith
Thomas J Arneson
Victor A Corbett
Joyce C Weinhandl
Carol J Lange
Peter J Hannan

Funding

Improving Diabetes by Primary Care Translation (IMPACT)R18DK061709 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI PETERSON, KEVIN ARTHUR · 2002 to 2005
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1 R18 DK061709-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK061709PHS HHS HHSN268200425212C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a multicomponent organizational intervention can produce significant change in diabetes care and outcomes in community primary care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis was a group-randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the practical effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention (TRANSLATE) in 24 practices. The intervention included implementation of an electronic diabetes registry, visit reminders, and patient-specific physician alerts. A site coordinator facilitated previsit planning and a monthly review of performance with a local physician champion. The principle outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving target values for the composite of systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mmHg, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl, and A1C <7.0% at baseline and 12 months. Six process measures were also followed.

resultsOver 24 months, 69,965 visits from 8,405 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were recorded from 238 health care providers in 24 practices from 17 health systems. Diabetes process measures increased significantly more in intervention than in control practices, giving net increases as follows: foot examinations 35.0% (P < 0.0.001); annual eye examinations 25.9% (P < 0.001); renal testing 28.5% (P < 0.001); A1C testing 8.1%(P < 0.001); blood pressure monitoring 3.5% (P = 0.05); and LDL testing 8.6% (P < 0.001). Mean A1C adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity decreased significantly in intervention practices (P < 0.02). At 12 months, intervention practices had significantly greater improvement in achieving recommended clinical values for SBP, A1C, and LDL than control clinics (P = 0.002).

conclusionsIntroduction of a multicomponent organizational intervention in the primary care setting significantly increases the percentage of type 2 diabetic patients achieving recommended clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID18809622
PMCPMC2584171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.