Trial reportDiabetes care2008
Improving Diabetes Care in Practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial.
Trial report in Diabetes care, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Health outcomes measurement and organizational readiness support quality improvement: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Impact of Information Technology-Based Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Glycemic Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Pooled it
- Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2011Pooled it
- Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners' diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2011Pooled it
- Sustainability of an electronic technology-based intervention in general practice targeting improved detection and monitoring of the interrelated chronic vascular diseases.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Trial
- Effect of 2 Clinical Decision Support Strategies on Chronic Kidney Disease Outcomes in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2018Trial
- Results from the CLUES study: a cluster randomized trial for the evaluation of cardiovascular guideline implementation in primary care in Spain.BMC health services research · 2018Trial
- Electronic reminders to facilitate longitudinal care: a mixed-methods study in general practices.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Trial
- Cluster-randomized trial to improve the quality of diabetes management: The study for the efficacy assessment of the standard diabetes manual (SEAS-DM).Journal of diabetes investigation · 2016Trial
- Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Implementation science : IS · 2015Trial
- Effect of an educational toolkit on quality of care: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.PLoS medicine · 2014Trial
- Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in addiction treatment settings: design and intervention protocol of a group randomized pilot study.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2014Trial
- Improving evidence-based primary care for chronic kidney disease: study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial for translating evidence into practice (TRANSLATE CKD).Implementation science : IS · 2013Trial
- The Vermont diabetes information system: a cluster randomized trial of a population based decision support system.Journal of general internal medicine · 2009Trial
- Impact of electronic health record clinical decision support on diabetes care: a randomized trial.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Enhancing Type 2 Diabetes Management Involving Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a multicomponent organizational intervention can produce significant change in diabetes care and outcomes in community primary care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis was a group-randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the practical effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention (TRANSLATE) in 24 practices. The intervention included implementation of an electronic diabetes registry, visit reminders, and patient-specific physician alerts. A site coordinator facilitated previsit planning and a monthly review of performance with a local physician champion. The principle outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving target values for the composite of systolic blood pressure (SBP) <130 mmHg, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl, and A1C <7.0% at baseline and 12 months. Six process measures were also followed.
resultsOver 24 months, 69,965 visits from 8,405 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were recorded from 238 health care providers in 24 practices from 17 health systems. Diabetes process measures increased significantly more in intervention than in control practices, giving net increases as follows: foot examinations 35.0% (P < 0.0.001); annual eye examinations 25.9% (P < 0.001); renal testing 28.5% (P < 0.001); A1C testing 8.1%(P < 0.001); blood pressure monitoring 3.5% (P = 0.05); and LDL testing 8.6% (P < 0.001). Mean A1C adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity decreased significantly in intervention practices (P < 0.02). At 12 months, intervention practices had significantly greater improvement in achieving recommended clinical values for SBP, A1C, and LDL than control clinics (P = 0.002).
conclusionsIntroduction of a multicomponent organizational intervention in the primary care setting significantly increases the percentage of type 2 diabetic patients achieving recommended clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.