Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18809224›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2008

MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings.

Mitch McVey, Sang Eun Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 567 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
567citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

567 citing papers in PubMed, 983 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DNA Repair Mechanisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Aging alters DNA structure-induced genetic instability in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

507 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mitch McVeyDepartment of Biology, Tufts University, 165 Packard Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA. mitch.mcvey@tufts.edu
Sang Eun Lee
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USTufts University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Error Prone Repair of DNA BreaksR01GM071011 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LEE, SANG EUN · 2004 to 2021
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks are normal consequences of cell division and differentiation and must be repaired faithfully to maintain genome stability. Two mechanistically distinct pathways are known to efficiently repair double-strand breaks: homologous recombination and Ku-dependent non-homologous end joining. Recently, a third, less characterized repair mechanism, named microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), has received increasing attention. MMEJ repairs DNA breaks via the use of substantial microhomology and always results in deletions. Furthermore, it probably contributes to oncogenic chromosome rearrangements and genetic variation in humans. Here, we summarize the genetic attributes of MMEJ from several model systems and discuss the relationship between MMEJ and 'alternative end joining'. We propose a mechanistic model for MMEJ and highlight important questions for future research.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedSequence DeletionAnimalsBase SequenceChromosomal InstabilityDNADNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesEndonucleasesGenetic VariationHumansMolecular Sequence DataSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNADNA Repair EnzymesEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID18809224
PMCPMC5303623
OpenAlexW2132920733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.