Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18808207›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2008

Viral hepatitis in elderly haemodialysis patients: current prevention and management strategies.

Matthias Girndt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthias GirndtMedical Department IV, University of the Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany. matthias.girndt@medizin.uni-halle.de
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viral hepatitis continues to be a relevant topic for haemodialysis centres, although the number of infected dialysis patients is declining in most countries. Chronic hepatitis B and C lead to detrimental complications such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. These complications can be avoided by successful antiviral treatment. In individuals with normal renal function, drug therapy of chronic hepatitis B is evolving quickly. Today there are several options but no agreed standard therapy. In the absence of renal failure, chronic hepatitis C should be treated with a combination of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin. For both infections, there is no general indication to treat all patients; several criteria can be used to predict benefits and downsides. Chronic renal failure severely alters immune function, particularly activation of T lymphocytes and cytokine production by mononuclear cells. Aging further influences the immune system with deviation of T-lymphocyte differentiation. Both effects seem to act additively, leaving the elderly haemodialysis patient with extensive immune dysfunction. While these effects do not put the patient at risk of opportunistic infection, they do have a relevant effect on the clinical course of viral hepatitis. Haemodialysis patients infected with hepatitis B manifest a subclinical, often anicteric disease, and at least 60% of the infections become chronic. These patients usually do not fulfil the criteria for successful antiviral treatment, since they have normal or slightly elevated liver enzyme levels and few histological signs of liver inflammation. In addition, the prognosis in terms of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma might be more favourable than in individuals with normal renal function. The former standard treatment of chronic hepatitis B with interferon-alpha or its derivate pegylated interferon was badly tolerated in dialysis patients and associated with low efficacy. Indeed, prior to the advent of nucleoside analogues there was a clear recommendation not to treat chronic hepatitis B infection in all except a few dialysis patients. However, the newer treatment options appear to work well. In particular, there is growing evidence for the effectiveness and tolerability of lamivudine in dialysis patients, including the elderly. Use of adefovir and entecavir has also been reported in a few cases. At present, while we still do not recommend treatment, therapy with nucleoside analogues might be an option in selected patients, for example, those planning renal transplantation. The major effort against hepatitis B should be directed at vaccination and hygienic precautions to prevent the infection.Treatment of hepatitis C in patients undergoing haemodialysis is also limited by the poor tolerability of interferons. Ribavirin is contraindicated because of severe haemolytic anaemia, although a few studies have attempted to manage this with administration of high doses of erythropoetin. Those patients who complete the full course of interferon therapy may expect sustained viral responses comparable with healthy individuals, but in most trials, 30-50% of patients were forced to interrupt treatment because of adverse effects. There is no general indication to treat chronic hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients. Arguments in favour of treatment include elevated liver enzymes, histological signs of relevant liver inflammation, younger age, a virus genotype other than 1 and planned renal transplantation.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAgedHealth Services for the AgedHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis C, ChronicHepatitis, Viral, HumanHumans

Identifiers

PMID18808207
OpenAlexW2080311291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.