Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18807062›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2009

The Stem Cell Network model: clinical implications in cancer.

Rubén Cabanillas, José L Llorente

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rubén CabanillasDepartamento de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, c/C. Villamil s/n, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.
José L Llorente

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review will discuss the aspects of stem cell biology that can contribute to explain tumor development and why standard oncology treatments sometimes fail. We also propose an integrated model of tumor progression based on the putative occurrence of Stem Cell Networks (SCNs). In a SCN, the somatic stem cells are derived from a common embryonic stem cell, share a specific molecular profile and maintain a high degree of cell-cycle synchronization. In the study of cancer, the SCN model introduces an additional conceptual frame to the interpretation of both the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis and the field cancerization concept. The CSC model may explain how the cancer fields develop, justifies their sizes and shapes, contribute to explain the local recurrences in patients with free margins, the second primary tumors, the success of organ preserving surgical approaches or the trend of different tumors to metastasize to certain locations. We propose that the SCN model of cancer provides some clues for further understanding tumor progression and raises promising experimental and clinical implications.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell CommunicationCell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease ProgressionHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsPrecancerous ConditionsRisk FactorsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.